Laserfiche WebLink
7. Copy of E.M.C. 19.4.020, page 4-20 - Zoning definition of "Non- <br />conforming Use" <br />8. Copy of E.M.C. 18.32.020 - Policy Language in Subdivision Code <br />AII of the exhibits are available for inspection a� the Hearing Examiner's Office <br />located at 293G Wetmore Avenue, 8th floor, Everett, Washington. <br />After due consideration of the testimony and evidence presented by the <br />Appellant, testimony and evidence elicited during the public hearing, and as the <br />result of the personal inspection of the subject property and surrounding areas <br />by the Everett Hearing Examiner, the following Findings of Fact and <br />Conclusions constitute the basis of the decision of the Everett Hearing <br />Examiner. <br />FINDINGS OF FACT <br />The Appellant is the owner of a 10,890 square foot parcel that consists of <br />lots 14-16, Block 456 in the Plat of Altamont Addition to Everett (subject <br />property). On-site is a single-family residence (2127 Harrison Avenue, <br />Everettj that was constructed in 1910. There is also a duplex structure <br />on-site (3605 - 22nd Street SE, Everett) that was constructed in 1978. in <br />1998, the Appel�ant sought a Certification of a Non-conforming Use for <br />the duplex. The Certification was denied by the City Planning Director <br />on June 12, 1998, and the Certification was again denied on February 3, <br />2000. The Appellant appealed the denials. (exhibit 1, Palacios <br />testimony) <br />2. In 1978 the City of Everett issued a Building Permit for the construction <br />of the duplex. Although the plot plan that was presented to the City at <br />that time did not correctly and accurately describe the subject property <br />and did not include depiction of a single-family residence on the parcel, <br />the City Building O�cial granted the Building Permit for the duplex. <br />There is no evidence as to whether a site view was done at that time. <br />The duplex was constructed and has been in use since 1978. All of this <br />activity wa� done by a predecessor of the Appellant. (exhibit 1, Palacios <br />testimony) <br />3. The zoning for the subject property is R-2, Single-Family Residential. In <br />an R-2 zone, single-family residences are required to have a minimum <br />lot size of 4,500 square feet and duplexes must have a minimum lot size <br />of 7,500 square feet. In an R-2 zone, two separate structures, such as <br />that as exist on the subject property, are not permitted unless a Non- <br />conforming Use Certification is granted. (exhibft 1) <br />2 <br />