Laserfiche WebLink
.-� ,- <br /> � <br /> 2. That such variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a <br /> ' substantial property right oE the appellant possessed by the owners oE <br /> o[her properttes in the same vicinity or zone; <br /> Finding: The appl.icant's property is located in an R-1 zone and is ' <br /> being used per that r.equirement. There are other carports on lOth '. <br /> Street thdt have similar setbacks. ' <br /> Conclusion: The carport and setback pruposed would not be <br /> inconsistent with the buildings in the area. <br /> 3. That the authorization of such variance will not be materially ' <br /> detrimental to the public welfare or injurtous to property in the �; <br /> vicinity or zone in which the property .Ls located. <br /> Finding: There are already carports in the same block with a similar ' <br /> setback. ; <br /> Conclusion: The granting of the variance would not aFfect property in : <br /> i tfie vicinitq. <br /> , 4• That the granting of such a variance will not adversely affect thej <br /> Comprehensive Plan. <br /> Finding: The property !s shown as Single Family Residential. <br /> Conclusion: This variance will not affect the Comprehensive Plan. <br /> I RECONMENDATION: APPROVE I <br /> " Approve the variance as requested Uy the applicant with the following <br /> conditions. ' <br /> 1. The applicant must securr. all proper building permits as required byl <br /> the Building Department. � <br /> I <br /> � <br /> I <br /> � <br /> —Z— <br /> � <br /> . <br />