Laserfiche WebLink
CITY OF EVERETT FISCAL ANNEXATION ANALYSIS <br /> • While the analysis does make estimates of FTE needs at annexation and through the buildout <br /> period, actual decisions regarding hiring and staffing will be made by the Council during each <br /> budget cycle, based on City priorities and actual demand. <br /> • By assuming the full cost of providing services from the date of annexation, the analysis does not <br /> infer any short-term cost savings associated with gradually ramping up levels-of-service.To actually <br /> deliver services from the date of annexation would likely require some level of pre-hiring (costs <br /> which are not estimated in this analysis) or, more likely, some level of contracting with existing <br /> service providers to augment the City's ability to meet the needs of the annexation areas <br /> immediately. <br /> • The only capital costs that are estimated as part of this analysis indude the one-time and ongoing <br /> equipment costs associated with new staff. These costs include expenses related to information <br /> technology for all employees, and specialized equipment and vehicles for Police department staff. <br /> Facilities and equipment for the Fire Department are assumed to be acquired from Fire District 1 <br /> as part of the asset transfer to the City required by state law. <br /> • The future changes in service demands and City revenues are a function of explicit assumptions <br /> regarding growth and development, inflation factors and the assumption of maintaining current <br /> levels of service and continuation of current tax and fee policies. <br /> • The voter-approved EMS levy is assumed to be renewed every six years at the full $0.50 rate. <br /> 2.2 Process for Scenario Screening and Evaluation Criteria <br /> The analysis of annexation scenarios was conducted in a two step process: (1) an initial screening of <br /> all seven annexation scenarios to assess the relative fiscal impacts of each; and (2) a more detailed <br /> feasibility assessment of the most promising options, which included additional work with several <br /> departments to determine the most cost-effective service delivery approaches. <br /> Initial Scenario Screening <br /> Upon identifying the seven annexation scenarios, we met with the City staff to document existing <br /> service levels, department positions, and their demand drivers. This piece of analysis provided <br /> baseline information to determine how City staffing might be expected to change in response to new <br /> demand associated with annexation. At the same time, operating revenue estimates were generated, <br /> including all sources of the City's general government funding. <br /> Based on this initial operating expense and revenue estimates for all scenarios, an initial screening of <br /> the scenarios was conducted and reviewed with City staff to determine which scenarios might deserve <br /> further detailed analysis. Scenario feasibility was determined based on several evaluation criteria: <br /> • Percentage of City-wide surplus or deficit that would occur upon annexation, in 2015, 2020, and <br /> 2025. A potentially acceptable deficit threshold was three percent of City-wide expenditures after <br /> the State sales tax credit. <br /> • Areas that had high revenues per capita could also have high costs per capita — therefore, it was <br /> also important to look at operating costs and revenues in terms of total and per capita amounts. <br /> IL Final Report:October 2008 Page 8 <br />