My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2008/10/15 Council Agenda Packet
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2008
>
2008/10/15 Council Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/3/2017 8:34:34 AM
Creation date
4/3/2017 8:33:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Agenda Packet
Date
10/15/2008
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
231
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CITY OF EVERETT FISCAL ANNEXATION ANALYSIS <br /> Detailed Feasibility Analysis <br /> Upon narrowing down to a few "most feasible" scenarios, more detailed feasibility assessments were <br /> developed. During this portion of the analysis, a considerable amount of additional work was <br /> undertaken with several key departments in terms of both operational implications and magnitude of <br /> cost impacts. The additional effort was generally focused on police and fire services which are the two <br /> departments with the greatest cost implications for the City resulting from annexation. <br /> 3.0 LAND-BASED DEVELOPMENT ASSUMPTIONS <br /> Development assumptions within the City of Everett and contemplated annexation areas are based on <br /> Snohomish County Buildable Lands/nventon/, updated in 2007. This assessment of buildable lands <br /> provides estimates of future population and employment capacity for all cities and urban growth areas <br /> in the county. In general, growth is expected to come from the following primary sources: <br /> • Vacant parcels <br /> • Redevelopable parcels—these parcels with low-value structures are assumed to have potential for <br /> redevelopment;they are identified according to the ratio of land value to improvement value <br /> • Partially-used parcels —these parcels with existing structures that use only a portion of the site are <br /> assumed to have potential for additional development without demolition of the existing buildings <br /> • Pending parcels — parcels with development already planned or permitted by Snohomish County <br /> If the parcels are identified as vacant, redevelopable or partially used, land is set aside for wetlands <br /> and other critical area, as well as roads, right-of-ways, churches, schools, and parks. In terms of <br /> commercial and industrial development, the estimated land capacity was converted to capacity for <br /> building structures by applying specific density assumptions. Floor Area Ratios (FAR) of 0.35 for <br /> commercial and 0.3 for industrial were used to reflect the current character as well as current zoning <br /> of the commercially-zoned land. These FAR ratios generally reflect the potential for one to two story <br /> business-park type developments. For example, at an FAR of 0.33, a 100,000 square foot industrial <br /> building would require 300,000 square foot of land (approximately 6.9 acres). <br /> In addition, some of Everett's large pending projects (such as Riverfront and Port Gardner Wharf) were <br /> directly included in the model based on current development plans. <br /> For each zoning category of buildable land, an estimate was made of how much of the development <br /> capacity is likely to be consumed over the next 20 years. The percent-of-buildout assumption is based <br /> on the total capacity in the pending (permitted) category plus a review of historic trends for <br /> development in the City and annexation areas. The estimate of development capacity for both <br /> residential and commercial lands and the baseline assumptions for 20-year growth are shown in <br /> ' City of Everett requested Buildable Lands GIS files from Snohomish County, and Berk&Associates used these <br /> files to generate buildable lands figures based on contemplated annexation area boundaries. For more detailed <br /> data for Everett, its MUGAs, and gap areas, see Snohomish County Tomorrow 2007 Buildable Lands Report on <br /> the County's web site. <br /> fl Final Report:October 2008 Page 9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.