Laserfiche WebLink
Jan Meston <br /> From: Fred Josephson [fredjosephson@yahoo.com] <br /> Sunday, September 07, 2008 9:18 AM <br /> Jan Meston <br /> Cc: Katrina Lindahl; Karol Dereg; Steve Fox <br /> Subject: Historic Overlay <br /> Commissioners, <br /> I got my notice about a hearing for a proposed historic overlay zone by the Everett <br /> Historical Commission on Wednesday Evening. An previous commitment will likely prevent my <br /> attendance, too bad because I might hear information there to sway my negative impression <br /> of the proposal. <br /> Historic overlay zones are intended to preserve the historic character of an area by <br /> placing building constraints, and an additional level of review regarding building with <br /> view to preserving the historic character the area. I am sure it becomes more difficult to <br /> add more zones, as developers point out <br /> the size of areas already protected. Historic preservation protection therefore should be <br /> conferred only on the most deserving areas, and only if the protection is going to have <br /> some tangible effect. <br /> The proposed zone is zoned residential most of it the very restrictive R-2 zone, some of <br /> it along Everett Ave and south is zoned R4, there is only one business in the zone the <br /> Fireplace Tavern, and it is grandfathered and in a sense a historic establishment. <br /> Curiously with in a block of the proposed overlay zone there are at least five 19th <br /> century structures, and within the zone not a single one. But my point was that <br /> development pressure in the R2 zone is very low, and the new design rules would not apply <br /> to commercial buildings. <br /> Imagine if the east end of Hewitt Avenue, a place with buildings on the national historic <br /> gister was historic overlay zone. And businesses there were compelled to incorporate <br /> atures reminiscent of historic Riverside. But in the case of proposed zone the design <br /> rules will do nothing but make it more difficult to build a garage. <br /> So in my opinion the historic structures in the proposed overlay zone are not really <br /> threatened by development, and proposed zone would just take up space on the map, in the <br /> place of some area that would actually benefit from being a historical overlay zone. But I <br /> should address whether the proposed zone is deserving of protection. <br /> Within the zone there are really two different areas, one is the Baker-Virginia Avenue <br /> area mostly in the Everett "I" division plat of 1902, and the Ready Land Co plat of 1910. <br /> These are relatively new parts of Riverside which as the neighborhood organization is <br /> proud of proclaiming was established in 1892. And from a historical and architectural <br /> stand point these two neighborhoods have more to do with Bayside than they do Riverside. <br /> The point is that though Baker and Virginia represent pretty streetscapes the kind of <br /> structures on them are not at all scarce in the north end. <br /> The ready land company development is a little more novel, but not I judge even close to <br /> the extent that the ill fated Donovan District was. <br /> respectfully <br /> Fred Josephson <br /> 2711 California St. <br /> 1 <br />