My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
8522 9TH AVE SE 2016-01-01 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
9TH AVE SE
>
8522
>
8522 9TH AVE SE 2016-01-01 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/19/2017 10:17:06 PM
Creation date
4/3/2017 2:17:44 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
9TH AVE SE
Street Number
8522
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
34
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
C C <br />EN NIG EERING <br />Design Clarification M�mo <br />Nelson Residence <br />Project No. 07221.10 <br />DCM No. 1 <br />To: Clark Nelson, Owner <br />From: Greg A Guillen, PE, SE <br />Date: November 18'", 2008 <br />gc���o-��� <br />During construction on ihe Nelson Residence located at 8522 9"' Ave SE in Everett, Washington, the <br />contractor has informed us ihat he cannot obtain Brm undisturbed earih where tha grade bearn is to <br />be installed as originatly cal!ed out in our shvctural drawings without excava6ng an adddonal several <br />feet. <br />Since excavaling ihese additional feet may significantty incxeasa labor cost, we would Gke to <br />recomme�d the allomative option as follows. We wiil inaease fhe grade beam depth from 8' to 17 <br />and put (3) N4 bars in both lhe top and bottom of the grade beam. This wiil stiffen the grade beam <br />significan0y so that it has ihe ability to spread load from the columns above more effedively and <br />span between unstable soils below. This will slighUy irxxease material and labor fees for a larc,�er <br />gradQ beam and more reinforang, but will be oonsidarably les� than the extensive excavating to <br />achieve firm soil as required in the original design. <br />Please be aware lhat this altemative option will not eliminate grade beam failure due to turther soil <br />seUlement in the future and does not equate to the orginal desigci requirement of excavatiny to firtn, <br />undistu?.red soil. However we believe ft to be an acceptable aNemate given the circumstances. <br />Please wntact CG Engineering on how you wish io proceed. <br />250 4" Ave. South, SWtq 200, Edmonds, WA 88020 Officc 425.778.&500 Fa�c 425.77P.5538 � <br />I� <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.