Resolution 4406 - Laserfiche WebLink

The subject property is situated in such a manner that the proposed Low Density Multiple Family Residential land use designation is not at all consistent with the locational criteria contained in the Land Use Element. (Staff report for Planning Commission public hearing of December 3, 1996). 23. The Comprehensive Plan requires that the following factor shall be considered in reviewing land use map amendment requests. 1) The proposed land use designation must be supported by or consistent with the existing policies of the various elements of the comprehensive plan. (Section 1.H of Ordinance #2161-96). 2) Have circumstances related to the subject property and the area in which it is located changed sufficiently since the adoption of the Land Use Element to justify a change to the land use designation? If so, the circumstances which have changed should be described in detail to support findings that a different land use designation is appropriate. (Section 1.H of Ordinance #2161-96). 3) Are the assumptions upon which the land use designation of the subject property is based erroneous, or is new information available which was not considered at the time the Land Use Element was adopted, that justify a change to the land use designation? If so, the erroneous assumptions or new information should be described in detail to enable the Planning Commission and City Council to find that the land use designation should be changed. (Section 1.H of Ordinance #2161-96). 4) Does the proposed land use designation promote a more desirable land use pattern for the community as a whole? If so, a detailed description of the qualities of the proposed land use designation that make the land use pattern for the community more desirable should be provided to enable the Planning Commission and City Council to find that the proposed land use designation is in the community's best interest. (Section 1.H of Ordinance #2161-96). 5) Should the proposed land use designation be applied to other properties in the vicinity? If so, the reasons supporting the change of several properties should be described in detail. If not, the reasons for changing land use designation of a single site, as requested by the proponent, should be provided in sufficient detail to enable the Planning Commission and City Council to find that approval as requested does not constitute a grant of special privilege to the proponent or a single owner of property. (Section 1.H of Ordinance #2161-96). 6) What impacts would the proposed change of land use designation have on the current use of other properties in the vicinity, and what measures should be taken to assure compatibility with the uses of other properties in the vicinity? (Section 1.H of Ordinance #2161-96). 7) Would the change of the land use designation sought by the proponent create pressure to change the land use designation of other properties in the vicinity? If so, would the change of land use designation for other properties be in the best long term interests of the community in general? (Section 1.H of Ordinance #2161-96). 24. The applicant's response to consistency with the comprehensive plan includes citation of Housing Element policies calling for increasing the ratio of housing units to jobs, providing housing near employment centers including such areas as southwest Everett - Paine Field, and 6