3126 12TH ST 2016-01-01 MF Import

r � � � NOTICE OF PLANNING DIRECTOR PECISION IIB #18-95 Ap�licant: Ray Moore 9502 19th Ave S.E., Suite C Everett, WA 98208 Project Location: 1200 hlock of Chestnut StreedLots 13, 14 & 15, Blk. 229, Plat of Everett Division "O" Zoning: GI, General Commercial Proposai: The applicant has requested P:anning Director's approval for the development of three non conforming lots located in the 1200 block of Chestnut Street. Each of the lots is 40 feet wiae by 120 feet deep, resulting in a lot area of 4800 square feet per lot. The G1 zoning district requires a minimum lot area of 5,000 square feet for residential purpoees. In accordance with Section 38.080.0 of the City's Zoning Code pertaining to non conforming lots, the applicant is proposing to develop each of the lots witl� a single family residence. The proposed development of the lots is subject to the ?eneral evaluation criteria lis[ed in Subsection 41.ISO.0 of the City's.'_oning Code as follows: 1. The need of the neighborhood, district, �r City for a proposed special property use. Findings: TLe proposed use is the construction of three single family residences on three lots known as lots 13, 14 & 15, block 229, Plat of Everett Division "0". Conclusions: The surrounding area is developed with residential and some commercial uses. 2. The adequacy of streets, utilities and public services required to serve a proposed use. Findibgs: Chestnut Avenue, which abuts the subject prope�'iy, is an unimproved right-of-way. The property is accessed via a 16' �vide right-of-way gravel alley. The City Public Works Department is requiring that the alley way be paved per City Standard#303 &om 13th Street to the north property line of lot 15. The installation of a water main &om 13th Street north to lot 15 within the Chesfiut Avenue right-of-way and the installaticn of a sewer main from 13th Street north to lot 15 within the Chestnut Avemie right-of-way if the proposed residences cannot gravity flow to the existing sewer line in the alley. Tlie City's Fire Department is requiring the installation of residential sprinkler systems for each li dwelling to be constructed on the lots. Conclusions: Adequate provisions for access, utilities and public services for tlte proposed residences can be accommodated subject to the above conditions. 3. The impact of traffic generated by the proposed use on t6e surrounding area, pedestrian circulation and public safety; and the ability of the proponent to mitigate such potential impacts. Findings: The proposed addition of three new single family residences will add approximately 30 average daily trips [o the area. The City Public Works Department has required [lie alley- way to be paved per City Standards. Conclusions: There�vill be no adverse traf£c impacts generated by the proposal. �3