Laserfiche WebLink
22. The internal street within the subdivision will be a dedicated public right-of-way <br /> with a 28 foot paved way. The Applicant wil! make all improvements, including <br /> pedestrian curbs, gutters, and sidewalks. A dedication of a 45 foot wide road for <br /> internal circulation must be made to the City of Everett by the Applicant. <br /> (Witcher testimony) <br /> 23. The proposal is not in a significant flood plain. Flood plain requirements do not <br /> apply. (Exhibit #1) <br /> 24. In addition to the preliminary plat, the Applicant seeks a Planned Residential <br /> Development. EMC 19, Chapter 32, sets forth the requirements for PRD's within <br /> the City. (Exhibit #1) <br /> 25. Direct access to the site can be accomplished without creating unacceptable <br /> volumes or a change of character of traffic along local streets and adjacent <br /> neighborhoods. In light of the traffic improvements to be made from mitigation <br /> fees, the road improvements of 2nd Avenue West, and the internal road <br /> improvements within the plat, the traffic access to the site will not create impacts. <br /> (Exhibit#1, Witcher testimony) <br /> 26. The site is located near sanitary sewers, water lines, storm and surface drainage <br /> systems, and other utility systems that can handle the increased use. There will <br /> be no requirement for enlargement of any of these utilities. (Exhibit #1, Witcher <br /> testimony) <br /> 27. The type of dwelling structures in the proposed development will be similar to <br /> that in adjoining properties. (Exhibit#1, Wood testimony) <br /> 28. The subject property is currently located in an R-3 zone. Single-family detached <br /> structures are permitted in this zone with a minimum lot width of 50 feet, a <br /> minimum lot depth of 80 feet, building setbacks of 20 feet for the front and rear, <br /> and 5 feet for the side yard. The proposed lots are approximately 4,400 square <br /> feet, and the lot and setback requirements of the R-3 zone will be reduced. <br /> However, the PRD overlay and its design standards can be developed without <br /> impact to other properties. (Exhibit #1, Wood testimony) <br /> 29. A density increase of the current zoning requirement is reasonable because the <br /> Everett General Plan projects the subject property to be developed at a much <br /> higher density than as proposed. The development density standards are <br /> satisfied. (Wood testimony) <br /> 30. The Applicant proposed landscaping which will provide a uniform streetscape <br /> and landscape entryway. In addition, the dwellings will be landscaped <br /> consistent with other properties in the area. (Exhibit #1, Wood testimony) <br /> 5 <br />