My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 4305
>
Resolutions
>
Resolution 4305
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/4/2017 11:11:59 AM
Creation date
4/4/2017 11:11:54 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Resolutions
Resolution Number
4305
Date
7/24/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
16
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
HEARINGS EXAMINER FINDINGS AND DECISION <br /> SNOHOMISH COUNTY SEPA APPEAL NO. 1-95 <br /> Page 5 <br /> 9. In 1995 the City began an update of its Solid Waste Management Plan. The <br /> update included the formation of a Solid Waste Advisory Committee which included <br /> representatives of the Snohomish County Solid Waste Division and others. Late in <br /> 1995 the Committee prepared an amendment to the City of Everett Solid Waste <br /> Management Plan. (Doughty Testimony) <br /> 10. It is the County's contention that the City's SEPA analysis for the 1995 Plan <br /> failed to consider environmental impacts on both the City of Everett and Snohomish <br /> County that would result from the implementation of alternatives as set forth in the 1995 <br /> Plan. (Kelley-Clarke Testimony) <br /> 11 . A representative of the County testified that the County's solid waste system has <br /> been developed over the last six years as a regional integrated solid waste handling <br /> and disposal system designed to protect public health by managing solid wastes <br /> generated by the one half million residents of Snohomish County. In 1990 the City <br /> signed an interlocal agreement with the County purported to be part of a twenty year <br /> participation in the County waste system. The interlocal agreement is now the subject <br /> of litigation between the City and the County. (Kelley-Clark Testimony) <br /> 12. The County's waste program included exports of approximately 95% of the <br /> waste received, a curbside recycling program, development of the County's household <br /> hazardous waste program, the handling of construction and demolition debris through <br /> private companies, the construction of the County regional landfill, revenue bonds for <br /> the landfill construction, sale of revenue bonds for the landfill construction, and <br /> implementation of waste export processes. (Kelley-Clark Testimony) <br /> 13. Until 1974 the City of Everett owned and operated a municipal land fill for the <br /> disposal of solid waste. In 1974 the City closed its land fill facility and entered into <br /> agreements to dispose wastes at facilities owned and operated by Snohomish County. <br /> The City authorized Snohomish County to conduct planning for its waste materials and <br /> adopted the 1974 and 1981 Snohomish County Comprehensive Solid Waste Plan as <br /> the City Solid Waste Plan. (Exhibit 17) <br /> 14. In April 1988 the Everett City Council passed Resolution No. 2994, which <br /> directed the mayor to prepare a municipal solid waste management plan for the City of <br /> Everett. In the resolution the mayor was directed to give priority to the City's <br /> participation in the County's plan and to the proposed resource recovery facility. The <br /> resolution also required the City to study other options available. The Everett <br /> Municipal Solid Waste Management Plan was adopted by Resolution No. 3176 in May <br /> of 1989 as an element of a joint City of Everett/Snohomish County Plan. The revised <br /> plan was approved by the Department of Ecology in February 1991. (Exhibit 17) <br /> 15. The 1989 County Plan evaluated solid waste management alternatives. In the <br /> final environmental impact statement for the 1989 County Comprehensive Solid Waste <br /> Management Plan, four system alternatives were considered. Alternative 1 was the <br /> continued reliance on local land filling, and, it contained two variations, with and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.