My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 4168
>
Resolutions
>
Resolution 4168
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/11/2017 10:38:18 AM
Creation date
4/11/2017 10:38:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Resolutions
Resolution Number
4168
Date
9/13/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Second Chance <br /> SPU #5-93 <br /> Page -7- <br /> 20. The Attorney General of the State of Washington issued an opinion on the proposed <br /> facility. In the Attorney General opinion it was stated that the proposed juvenile <br /> care transition facility is a permitted use in a C-2 zone. A summary of the Attorney <br /> General's opinion (exhibit#9) is that if a term is not defined in the City code, it <br /> should be given its "commonest accepted meaning". The common and accepted <br /> meaning of a correctional facility, according to the Attorney General, is a facility <br /> housing persons convicted of crimes and having their freedom restricted and who <br /> are confined for the purpose of punishment and rehabilitation. According to the <br /> Attorney General, the proposed facility falls within this meaning of a correctional <br /> facility and should be allowed. <br /> The Attorney General also wrote that although the term "correctional facility" is not <br /> defined for juveniles, it is defined in RCW 70.48.020(4) for the incarceration of <br /> adults. The definition in this statute is a facility that is designed, staffed, and used <br /> for the housing of persons serving terms for the purpose of punishment and <br /> rehabilitation following conviction of a criminal offense. <br /> 21. Opponents submitted that the definition of a "correctional facility" as set forth in <br /> RCW 70.48.020(4) is not applicable to the review of the Second Chance facility. <br /> According to the spokesperson for the opponents, this statute pertains only to adult <br /> facilities and not to juvenile facilities, and only applies for County or City government <br /> operated facilities. According to the opponent, the Second Chance is a private <br /> facility and does not qualify. <br /> 22. Slatten contended that the juvenile facility is a Group Care Home - Class II. In EMC <br /> 19.4.010, Group Care Homes - Class II, are defined as <br /> "State licensed group-care homes for juvenile delinquents, <br /> halfway homes providing residence in lieu of institutional <br /> sentencing, halfway houses providing residence to those <br /> needing correctional institutions, and residential <br /> rehabilitation centers for alcohol and drug abusers". <br /> Slatten contended that group care homes in C-2 zones are limited to 20 persons, <br /> and because the juvenile facility as a group care home exceeds the 20 person limit, <br /> it is prohibited in a C-2 zone. <br /> CONCLUSIONS <br /> 1. The Applicant requested approval of a Special Property Use Permit and the <br /> issuance of Building and Public Works Permits for the construction of a 28 bed <br /> juvenile care transition facility. The project is proposed to be located on the corner <br /> of 40th Street and Smith Avenue, Everett, Washington, which is zoned C-2. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.