My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 4168
>
Resolutions
>
Resolution 4168
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/11/2017 10:38:18 AM
Creation date
4/11/2017 10:38:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Resolutions
Resolution Number
4168
Date
9/13/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Second Chance <br /> SPU #5-93 <br /> Page -8- <br /> 2. Pursuant to the State Environmental Policy Act and the City of Everett's <br /> environmental ordinances, the City Planning Department was designated the lead <br /> agency for environmental review. After initial issuance and withdrawal of a <br /> Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance (MDNS) for the property, the proposed <br /> project was finally given a MDNS. Slatten appealed the MDNS. <br /> 3. The issue before the Hearing Examiner is limited to the issue addressed by the City <br /> Council when it heard the Slatten MDNS appeal. The City Council issued <br /> Resolution #3817 in which it remanded the issue relating to the zoning classification <br /> of the subject property to the Hearing Examiner for further review. Specifically, the <br /> issue to be considered by the Hearing Examiner is whether the proposed juvenile <br /> care transition facility is a permitted use in a C-2, Heavy Commercial/Light Industrial <br /> zone. <br /> 4. The Everett Zoning Code lists "jails and correctional facilities" as permitted uses in a <br /> C-2 zone. There are no definitions of the terms "jails or correctional facilities" in the <br /> Everett Zoning Code. The City Council requested input from the Hearing Examiner <br /> as to whether the proposed juvenile care transition facility is a permitted use in C-2 <br /> zones and more specifically, whether or not the proposal is a jail or correctional <br /> facility. <br /> 5. The Planning Director of the City of Everett determined that the juvenile care <br /> transition facility is a correctional facility. Significant and considerable deference <br /> must be given to the officials of a City charged with the enforcement and review of <br /> ordinances for land use. Balser Investment vs. Snohomish County, 59 Wn.App. 29, <br /> 37, 795 P.2d 753; and Mall Inc. vs. Seattle, 108 Wn. 2d 369, 739 P.2d 668. Such <br /> deference is given to the director. <br /> 6. Juvenile offenders are en Med-to-rehabilitation and treatment (RCW 13.34.010(2)f <br /> and RCW 72.05.130). The juvenile care transition facility as proposed by Second <br /> Chance will fulfill this mandated requirement by giving juveniles the opportunity to <br /> attend work and school and provide individual group and family counseling, as well <br /> as social skills, training, self-esteem training, stress/anger management classes, <br /> and recreational and religious activities. The locale for said court required <br /> rehabilitation and treatment will be the Second Chance facility which will be a <br /> custodial institution and a correctional facility. <br /> 7. The facility is more restrictive than a group home because the juveniles who will be <br /> incarcerated at the juvenile care transition facility will have freedom restricted and <br /> will be allowed off the premises only to attend school, work, or counseling. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.