Laserfiche WebLink
� <br />To illustrate the effects thet each of these interpretations would have on Mr. Baker's property, <br />we heve copled portlons ot the map hom Raedeke and Associates' wetland Map and eketched in the <br />e(feclive setbecks in each case. Note that the preferred interpretatlon, assuminp s ealmonid Bsh <br />bearinp atream w(th a 100 toot setbedc and a catepory II wetland wlth a 60 foot eetbadc, the <br />stream ends up wNh en effect(ve setbadc ranpinp hom 100 feet, the minimum establiched (or <br />the stream based on Its own characteristics, fo 200 feet, as eztended by the wetland plus its <br />buffer. It ia our judqment that these setbadcs provide adequate protectlon tor both the siream <br />end wettand resources on the site. The eltanate Interpretation pives the Btream en eHedive <br />setbeck renginp hom 150 to 200 feet, whlch we teel la more than can be justlBed to protect <br />stream hebitat end is too restrictive w(th repard to potentlal uses of the aite. <br />We irust this letter pives an ad <br />passape in question and Illustn <br />80 ih8t 1hB dBC1810116 flB�'.6868ry <br />you heve any questlons or nee� <br />Sfncerely, <br />��� .�r� <br />dreq Johnston <br />Flsherles Bioloqlst, E.I.T. <br />Encloeurs <br />oc. 8rodc Baker <br />