1814 112TH ST SE 2016-01-01 MF Import

b. Conclueion: The applican['s property does nut con[ain any phyeical conditione or circumstances thet are unique to hie property for which a variance can be granted. The applican['s current signing doubles ula[ is ellowed in the B-1 zone. Even though [he o[her proper[les in the area heve larger eigne [hey are located in a B-2 zone. This does no[ conatitute a hardship based on the fac[ thet o[her proper[y in the area are zoned for a more inteneive use. 2. That euch variance ie not neceaear�� for the preaervation and enjoyment of a subetan[ial property right of [he applicant possessed by the ownere of o[her proper[ies in the sume vicinity or zone. a. Findin�: The applicant's property ia loca[ed in a B-1 zone and ie being ueed per [hat requirement. North of thie property is Olson'e Shopping Center which is zoned B-2 which permite larger eigning; South of thia p*operty ie a R-3 zone which hae more reetrictive eigning requtremen�s; Eaet and Weat of thie pr^rerty, the zoning is [he same, R-1. All [he eurrounding proper!y would require the eame amoun[ of eigning excep[ [he R-3 zone vhich is more res[rictive and the B-2 zone which ie more permieeive. h. Conclueion: The eigning [hat [he applican[ ie requesting, would no[ be available [o the majority of proper[y ownera in the area. If he were allowed to expnnd the signing ae propoaed, he would be enjoying a proper[y right which othere in the vicinity or zone do not have. 3. �Phat the authorization of such variance wlll be me[erlally de[rlmental to the public welfare or injurtoue to property in [he vicini[y or zone in which Che property is locn[ed. e. Findl.ng: The property Le adjacent to R-3 zoned proper[y which [he tntended uee ie for Multiple Fsmily Residential. The proper[y frontage ie on 112th S[. S.E. which ie a major nrterial and hae 11,110 [ripe per dey. The functlon of e arterlal e[reet le [o carry heavy and through treffic from a larger area. Accees and signing ehould be liml[ed [o prohibit confltcte. b. Conclueion: The authoriza[ion of apylicant'e variance would affect [he R-3 zoned property ae well as o[her proper[y !n the B-1 zone by allowing to much aigning adjacent to residen[lal uees and a major erterial. G. Tha[ the granting of auch variance will adversely n[fec[ [he Compreheneive Plan. a. Findin _ The Comprehenslve Plan sliowe thie a[ the edge of a Cummerlcal Node. The B-1 zone implementa [ha[ becauee of the type of uses allowed ln that zone and 6eing adjacen[ to residential zoned praperty. b. Conclusion: The granting of [he variance would be contrary to the Comprehenslve Plan. Thie use being rn edge in a[raneition area ts [o buffer incompatible uaes. Allowing excese signing would no[ be keeping wlih [hn[ in[ent. RECOtR1ENDATION: DGNY Deny Che varience �s requested hy the npplicnnC. �HIn�'�' # 4 U 1�