My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1910 112TH ST SW RIVERSTONE SITE DEV 2016-01-01 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
112TH ST SW
>
1910
>
RIVERSTONE SITE DEV
>
1910 112TH ST SW RIVERSTONE SITE DEV 2016-01-01 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/17/2017 2:23:38 PM
Creation date
4/14/2017 8:30:28 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
112TH ST SW
Street Number
1910
Tenant Name
RIVERSTONE SITE DEV
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
97
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
season, thereby meeting the criteria for wetland hydrology. Vegetation, soit, and <br />hydrologic criteria are all met for the area mapped as wetland. <br />Non-Wetland <br />The non•wetland areas on-site are comprised of maintained lawn represented by <br />colonial bentgrass (Agrostis tenuis, Fac), velvetgrass (Holcus lanatus, Fac►, perennial <br />ryegrass (Lolium perenne, Fac), and common dandelion (Turaxocum oJjicinole, <br />FacU►. Typical soils in the areas mapped as non-wet h,ave a Munsell color of dark <br />olive brown (2.5 Y 3/3) with a texture of sandy loam. Soils were found to be dry at <br />lhe time of our October 2003 site inves[igation. <br />Soils sampled in the areas mapped as non-wetland do not appear to be flooded, <br />ponded, or saturated long enough during the growing season to d2ve:op anaerobic <br />conditions in the upper part, and therefare do not appear to meet wetland soils <br />criteria. <br />There were no surface indicators of saturation or inundation in �ne non-we:land <br />areas. It appears that the areas mapped as non•wetland are saturated for a period <br />less than 5% of the growing season and therefore do not meet the wetland <br />hydrology criteria. <br />Because direct hydrologic indicators are lacking, and neither hydric soils nor <br />hydrophyfic vegetation are present in the areas mapped as wetland, it appears [ha! <br />they do not meec criteria for wetlands. <br />WE?LAND FUNCTIONS AND VALUES <br />Methodology <br />The melhodology for this func[ions and values assessment is based on professional <br />opinion developed tlirough past field analyses and interpretation. This assessment <br />pertains specificatly to the on-site wetland, but is typical (or assessments of similar <br />systems common to western Washington. <br />Functions and Values Components <br />Wetlands in western Washington perform a variety of ecosystem functions. <br />Included among the most important functions provided by wetlands are stormwater <br />storage and flood flow attenuation, water quality improvement, and fish and wildlife <br />liibitat. An assessment of these functions for the project site are provided below. <br />EXISTI�:G CONDITIONS <br />The off-site wetlands provide a moderate to high level of functions and values. As a <br />result of its large size, forested vegetation, and associa[ion with Swamp Creek, <br />Wetland A provides good value for all functions. Wetland B provides moderate value <br />for all functions, these are limited by its small size and proximity to development. <br />5 � <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.