Laserfiche WebLink
March 1A. 1994 10 943-]525 <br />4.'l Field InveaHgation <br />Our field investigation was conduded on March 8, ]994 and consisted of excavating 8 test <br />pits (TP•1 through TP-8) on the site to a maximum depth of 14 feet. The test pits were <br />excavated using a rubber-tired backhoe under the full-time direction of a member of our <br />engineering staff. The test pits were located in the field by pacing from existing site <br />landmarks. Test pit locations and ;levations were interpolated from a site plan prepared by <br />Target Surveyors, Inc., dated April 8, 1993. Our field engineer observed and directed the test <br />pit explorations, collected representative, but disturbed aoil samples, and recarded soil <br />descriptions, stretigrephy, density/consistency, and groundwater data on a test pit log form. <br />Summary logs of the test pits are presented in Appendix A. Soil samples were described <br />using the Uni(ied Soil Class�cation System (USCS). An explanation of the classification <br />system is included with the test pit logs. Soil samples were returned to our geotechnical <br />laboratory for storage. The test pits were backfilled at the conclusion of sampling and <br />observations. The backfill was tamped in place with the backhoe bucket; I�owever, some <br />ground settlement over the test pit should be expected. <br />4.3 Subsurface CondiUons <br />4.3.1 Soil <br />The soil conditions described here represent those conditions observed 3n our test pits. Our <br />test pits encountered a consistent stretigraphic soil section that consisted of a layer of topsoil <br />or forest duff, underlain by a compact to very dense till. The upper portion of the till was <br />weathered and generally compact to dense. The lower till was unweathered and typically <br />dense to very dense. Fill was encountered in only one test pit, TP-1, to a depth of 1.5 feet. <br />The units are described in greater detail below. <br />�opsoiUFore�t Duff - Thi3 unit was observed in all of our test pits and was composed <br />of a loose, organic rich silt and sand with occasional gravel. On lot 35 (T'P-1, 2, and 3) <br />the topsoil was only about 0.25 to 0.75 feet thick and consisted of predominantly grass. <br />1n ihe remaining test pits the surface contained up to one foot of organic rich, silty <br />sand, forest duff. <br />Fill - Test pit TP-1 was the only test pit to encounter fill. The fill consisted of dense, <br />silty sand, IiNle grevel and was only about 1.5 feet thick The fill appeared to be <br />reworked soil from the subject site. It is likely that other areas of fill will be <br />encountered during construction in the vicinity of the existing house. <br />Weathered Till - This �nit was encountered below the topso�Vforest duff and below <br />the fill in TP-1. It was typically compact to drnse, and yeilow�sli brown in color as <br />opposed to the olive gray color of the underlying unweathered till. The weathered till <br />consisted of a silty sand, with little gravel, with a trace of organics. The contact <br />belween this unit and the unweathered till was gradational. Althaugh not observed <br />on this site, we have found that groundwater seepage is common near fhe <br />weathered/unweathered till contact. The water infiltrates through the weathered zone <br />and perches on the relatively impermeable, unweathered till. Our test pils did not <br />Golder Assoclates <br />