2200 116TH ST SE 2018-01-02 MF Import

AUG-17-04 10,05 FROM�CITY OF EVERETT CHIP ID,425257ee2e PAGE 2/4 After due consideration of the testimony and evidence presented by the Applicant and testimony and evidence elicited during the public hearing, the following Findings of Fact and Conclusions c,,nstitute the basis of the decision of the Everett Hearing Examiner. FINDINGS OF ACT 1. The Applicant is the owner of a single family lot located at 2uare foot detached 200-116th Street E Everett, Washington. it ishis ntto 5 surf In heighto EMC 19.7.020.H sets garage that would be approximatelyApplicant seeks the height limit of detached accessory buildings at 15 feet. The App exception of the height standard. (exhibit 1) 2. The subject property is zoned R-2, Single -Family Detached Medium Density. The property is a 21,780 square foot lot that has an existing residence. llte tot is an irregular shaped lot. Access appears to be via a private lane off of 116" Street S.E. (Ingalsbe testimony) e zoned B 2B and the properties to the 3. The properties to the north and west ar south and east have residential zoning of R-3 and R-1 respectively. The property to the south is vacant and development to the will is a ongreagateresur thecility. No aesthetic impacts on surrounding properties proposed structure. (exhibit 1, Ingalsbe testimony) 4. On the northwest portion of the subject property is a Category III wetland. The wetland is not impacted by the Applicant's proposal. (exhibit 1) treet 5. The subject property is approximately 300 feet from the nearest pub ssunsure as (116°i Street S.E.) which appears to be the access. The Applicant to whether an easement providing access from 116"' Street S.F. to the two adjoining properties had been recorded with Snohomish County; the City was of the opinion that it had been recorded. (exhibit 1, English testimony, Ingalsbe testimony) ot be visible 6 Thedetached acceE S E. pit would be developed inao ary bnner that satisfies uilding would setba k standardsoffrom 116'h Sten et feet from the nearest property line. It would be similar in scale to other structures in the ara. (exhibit 1, Ingalsbe testimony) 7. The proposed accessory building would be located northwest of the existing residence. It would be approximately 45 feet from the nearest single-family residence. The proposal would cause no view obstructions. No opposition was voiced with regard to the proposal. (exhibit 1) 8. The Applicant's original request was to construct a 1,050 square foot building which exceeds the maximum allowed square footage of 1,000 square feet for accessory buildings (see EMC 19.7.020.B). The design has been modified to 2