Laserfiche WebLink
2. That such variance is nece�sary tor t}ie preservatlon and enjoyment of a <br />substantial property right oC the appellant possessed by the oWners of <br />otYier properties in the same vicinity or zone. <br />FinAing: The Board of Adj�stment has granted other requests for <br />variance f�?m gross floor area retio and the City will continue to <br />recommend doing so until the zoning code is changed. <br />Conclusion: The variance would allow a property right possessed by <br />other owners. <br />3• That the aut;horiza::on of sueh variance will not be materially <br />detrimental to the publie welfare or lnjurious to property in the <br />vicinity or zone in which the property is located. <br />Findin : The actual Lot coverage is .24 and the zoning code limits the <br />height of the structure to 30 feet so there does not appear that there <br />would be any adverse affeet on other property. <br />Other City Departments have no objection to the varlance request, <br />however, the Public Works DepL. requires dedication of right-of-way <br />along Silver Lake Noad. <br />Conclusion: This varianee would not be inJurious to other property in <br />the vicinit+ and zone. <br />4. That the granting of such variance Nill not adversely affeet the <br />Comprehensive Ceneral Plan. <br />Findin : The Comprehensive Plan shoNs this area as single famlly <br />residential. <br />Conclusion: The variance would not affect the Comprehensive Plan. <br />AECOMMENDATION: <br />AF['AOVF, the varianee as requested by applicant with tiie folloaing conditions. <br />1. The building footprint shall not bo increased. <br />2. The Applicant shall obtain all necessary building permits. <br />) <br />Prepared b �,�os.,� �%�oas�s��_ <br />Reviewed by �y!/[�T.`i <br />NOTE TO DEVELOPER: <br />Publie Works Will require dedication of right-of-way along Silver Lake Drive <br />prior to issuance oC building permits. <br />288QF <br />