1600 121ST ST SE 2016-01-01 MF Import

34. When access to or within a structure or an area is unduly di�fic�lt because of secured open�ngs or where immediate access is necessary for life-saving or fire fighting purposes, the Fire Departmr,nt may recommend or require a key box to be installed in an accessible locat�.on. A rapid entry system may also be desi��able in order to avoid unnecessary damage while making entry to any building during an emergency situation. 35. Construction activities on the site must be in confortnance with the Ciry of Everett Noise Ordinance, EMC Chapter 20.08. This preGudes the operation of loud construdion equipment between �e hours of ten p.m. and seven a.m. or� weekdays and six p.m. and eight a.m. on Saturdays, Sundays, and state- recognized holidays. 36. The proposal must also compl� with all other Ciry Code and Ordinance r��quirements not specifically set foRh herein. General Information The proposed storm drainage system appears to collect the entire site's stormwater rtmoff and route it to the detention pond and biofiltratlon swale in the oastem portion ot the site. The stortn drainage will have to be modified to direct water to the wetlands (see CondiUon 14 of fhe MDNS). The drainage plan may need to direct rooftop runoft to the wetland areas. 2. The proposed swale area may not meet City standards for 3H:1V side slopes. Where a swale is located adjacent to a building, a minimum of ten feet of essentially flat ground must be provided between the b��iiding and the top of the swale, unless othenndse approved by the Fire Marshal. The engineer should coordinate the design ot the swale with the Public Works Departrnent, so that it meets City Standards. The biofiltration swa�e must be consUucted and planted per City standards, and not according to the details in the mitigation plans and other documents submitted with the SEPA application. Adequate detail must be shown on the detailed plans to enable the City to detertnine that the location of the proposed vepetated swale is feasible, inGuding the proposed finished floor elevaGons of buildings adjacent ta the swale and proposed prading contours. 3. 7ischarge of water to weUand should mimic the natural discharge as much as is feaaiGle. Where point sour�ce discharges do not occur under undeveloped conc�ftlons, such discharges should be avoided. Techniques that result in dfapersed discharpe, such as dispersion Venches or buried perforated pipe located at wetland buHer edges, can be used to mimic naturally occurtinp sheet flow into wetlands. Conditlon ' i of the MDNS requires that stortnwater be treated through vegetated ;, rales and oiVwater separators or throuph wetponds prior to discharge from the site or into streams or weUands. To keep hydrocarbons, pesticides, nutrient and sediment pollucion from the wetlands, the grading plan should provide for a small bertn around ail of fhe wetlands to pravent flow into them. This is particulaAy critical or, the south side ot Phase I, because the slope is essenBally flat (alevation 534) acroas the westem half of the development. Additionally, the east side of one of the Phase I buildings slopes directly into the EXMIIIt�.�. . a 5 OE�