1701 121ST ST SE 2016-01-01 MF Import

�� ��x C H 9H� rxy HZ� K O H� � H � cn ra �io� H C7 H�g n. c� z>y� rHH 8 `� H C�Cy �� �H[�i� H O tn � � a .� ALL[:N CURHII:R - APII:NDf:D DECISION SPU 5-fi5, Page -10- Collection of Waste Oil: A signed, notarized, and cecorded Letter (to be recorded with the Snohomish County Auditor) stating if evidence shows that oil is being dumped into the on-site �torm drainage system or 5'.lver Lake Erom the subject property, the owner will install a waste oil collection system to Publir Works �epartment specifications. The evidence necessary to subsl-a�tiate the dumping of waste oil in the on-site storm drainage system would be when the quantity of oil in the system exceeds the quantity of oil normally anticipated in a drainage system. The Gvr_rett P1a��ning Departm��nt submitted that the proposed revised condition N8 does not involve the ceyuired storm drainage detention facilities or the required oil/water separators for storm drai�age on the �ub�ect property. The collection of waste oil is the oit remaininq aEter maintenance oE privately owned vutiicles. (Ervine testimony) 6. The Everett Planning Department submit�ed that the enforcement of the pollution oE streams aiid bodies of water with waste oil is the jurisdictional authority o� the Department of Ecoloqy and the Department would enforce such laws. The Planning Department expressed approval of tne method as set forth in proposed condition k8. (Ervine testimony) Y�oposed revised condition dll reads as follcws: Local Improvement District Covenants: i'he Applicant must comply with the Public Works Department requirement to sign a Lo�.' Improvement District covenant. Any L.I.D costs charged t� the subject property woul.d improv^ property values an equal or greater amount. '� �� 8. The City submitted that proposed revised condition q11 is a cestatement of the law of the State of Washington and grants the ApplicanL the right tu contest L_i.D. assessments bit nnt the Corm.ition of a L.i.D. (F:rvine testimony)