1701 121ST ST SE 2016-01-01 MF Import

�� ��a C H 9HN r H�� K n H � Oxo � H � Vl H �30� HC OM r��8 c�. c� t'y� yy g H OGCCyN t*7 y t�] L HGC/� � � 1 � �11en �urrier Sho�rlino ?'3naaetsent Permit 5-6� Page -6- 13. Th� sians �ection of t';�_ Snohomi=h G^unty +taster Proaram (page F-ti2) sets forth the general reaulations and reauirements Eoc the allowance of _=igns for shoreline F�rmit requests. The Everett Planning Department recommended that all signs must comply with these requirements and the City of Evecett Zoning Code. Code compliance would be determined hy the Everatt Planning D�partment after a review of the detailed plans for signs. The AFolicant submitt��d that all sicnage will �omply with the reauicements of the Snohomish County �ta,tec Program and the City of Everett Zoning Code. (Staff report, Ervine testimony, Cur:ier testimony) 14. :!e City submitted that the �lpplicant must meet thF E:arkin9 code recuicements for cemmercial development. ;he standacd recommended is the shorping center stancard w'r.ich is one parking space per 200 squar? feet of aro=_s fioor area, or 160 spaces ceou�red Eor the structure. :he Applicant claimed that all parking code reauirements •,�:11 be satisfied with the commercial develocmer,t in accordance with the current reaulations. (Ervine testimony, Currier testimony) 15. The Everett Planr.ing Department cecommended that a 30' public waterfront lineal access easement for pedestriar� and water access be obtained fcom the Applicant. Accordina to the �ity, such an easement would result in compliance with the provision of Section 19.19G5 (a) s (b) and the Everett Parks Recreation Space Flan eE 197P and in particclar Appendix 6 which specifically detail=_ shoceline development. Further, Y.he City recommendeci :hat the Applicant provide an eight foot wide pedestrian pathway within the 30 Eoot access ea�ement. The pathway oroposed would be five feet from t`�e landward edae oE the 30' easement and at an =levation of 29 feet based on the Applicant's survey data. The eight foot pathwa•;� would be constructed with ccushed rock as a base ar.d would have six inchEs of 5/8" cruc;hed rock as a tor: courae. This pathway would be constructed at nppl;.cant's expense and would extend throuah th� Applicant's property where it front= Silver Lake. (Ervine testimony, Staff report) 16. eecause the =cb;ect propert� wa, annexed into the Cit; eE �vecett and is under the jurisdiction of [t�� t<ashirgton State Shoceline Act, the local Shorelir.� +faster Program cf the City of Everett should be used a� the basis for aranting the Permit. TI:e City of i:verett, however, has not amended its Master Proacam to includ�, the subject cropert7. t�'AC 1?3-19-OQ04 authorizes tF.•- l_1t}� OE EVEi�:t t�.:, r.l:;�' thE� ....i`�'.C�..C�, i'qUil« •.t-:�`n. . r�aram f.or r . . ,. � _ ... _ . ' �. .`.t�,=tc,r Fc�-��;::;c.