Laserfiche WebLink
��� <br />��a <br />G H <br />9HxN <br />HZ� <br />K n <br />H� <br />Ox0 <br />� VJH <br />[T7 O � <br />HC <br />tJ M <br />�it�nDy <br />c�- � <br />t y� <br />HH <br />ti <br />gdN <br />�i�� <br />H fn <br />HO(n <br />� � <br />�� <br />Alletl l:tl[C1nC <br />Shoreline Dlanagement P�cmit 5-0= <br />Paqe -�- <br />e. The sut�ect property was anne:<ed intc t;�e Cit� ef <br />Everetc but is not considered in the Snoceline Dtaster <br />Proa_am that was approved by the Department of Ecolo��p <br />in January, 1976. Therefore, based on the authority a� <br />cet forth in WAC 173-10-000?, the City oE Ev?rett ha= <br />adopted the provisions of the Snohomi=h Count.� �?a.=.ter <br />Program for a review of the aprlicat��n. !�rvice <br />testimony) <br />u <br />10 <br />The Snohomish County Shoreline hlastec =r^^-r'�- =`:" =�,��"_ <br />the subject pcoperty as an Urtan cnvironm.e^:. w!:'-cl'� <br />?ncompasses a wide range of uses, includina residential <br />and commercial activities similar to the proposal of the <br />Applicant. (Staff [Aport, Ervine testimony) <br />The commeccial development, as ocopos=d by th^ <br />Applicant, will not be water orientat=d. Thece will re <br />no need for shoreline frontaae and no specia: <br />consideration is plan�ed to enhance the relationshic oE <br />the commeccial activity to the shoceline. However, �s <br />�et forth in the Snoi�omish County t•!aster Prcgcam und�: <br />Commeccial Development regulations General 1(D), ther<_ <br />must be a provision for public visual and/or rh�r=ic�1 <br />access to thz shoreline. (Staff repoct, Er�;ine <br />testimony, Snohomish County ;das.er Proaram) <br />11. The commercial stcucture of the Applicant is �roj�-ct^d <br />[o be Located near the intersection of 19th P.venu� S.". <br />and Silver Lake Road. This structure will not Le <br />located near the water and wi11 be more than ten feet <br />from the ocdinary high �oater mark of Silver Lake. 'Ihe <br />City has recommended that the heiaht of the commercial <br />structuce shall be limited to 26 feet. The Applicar.t <br />submitted that the comme�cial structure should .-_ <br />limited to a height in accocdance with the B-2(B) zoriac <br />code. (Ervine te�timony, Curriec testimony) <br />12. Thz City in its ceview of the proposed co;nmerci:�1 <br />development submitted a recommended condition t!at <br />parking must be per City Zonina Code and Cit;� desian ar,� <br />construction standards. The Arr,]ic3nt coicec' '� <br />objection to this reauirtr�=nt. (3t�C` _�or�, rr';;"," <br />testimony, Cerri�r te=timcc;� <br />