1701 121ST ST SE 2016-01-01 MF Import

y�nH h7 � � �� G H 9H� r y�H K c) H� �� yNH �io� HV OH H�8 (1] V �] t^y� Ny g�� �H� H O V+ � �� r•.11en Currie: Shoeeline ht�n�:asr,.r.� I��:T,it ".-;', Fage -10- 29 s0. The Applicant submitted t-hat a five Eoot wal'�.�a'{ stcucture was being planned across the lagoon and the outlets oE Silver Lake for site residents only. The structure being planned by the Applicant would be limited to five feet in width because the pathwa;� serving it is only six to eight feet wide. According r.o the Applicant, the type of construction would te dependent upon gr�und levels and watee �unoff in t::� area. The stcuctuce should be built with available c�=t effective material up to a minimum size in crder r_.� mitigate any negative impacts on the lagoon. i�urri�r testimony) with the application for the Permit, the Applicant p�ovided a schematic site plan showing locations of th,� various buildinas oE the development. The building- <::: depicted in the plan are n�mero.:� �..-. �re =.c�tt�r^d throughout the entir? acceage of th�a .,.t�, !3i�_ c1ar, Gxhibit 2) � 31. The City has recommended that a11 r�=-ide;c::'- -;tc'��'-u-�` on site be a maximum of 12H Eeet ir 1�n�th �nd 'nave a minimum side yacd separation oE 20 feet. �?ccerdiny '^ the City, this will result in a more aestheticall; pleasing development. (Ecvine testimony) 32. The Applicar.t submitted that the residential structures �'�� will be designed to limit 1=ngt!� and maintain side y3rd � �� separations in accordance with the current cegulation�. No exact commitment of Length oc side yurd separati r: was submitted by the 4p41icant. (Cucrier testimony) 33. As part of approval, the City has recommended that �:'- r?sidential structuces must be set back a minimum of 1`_' Erom the southern Froperty line of the subje��r property. According to the City, this will insure th.�t the site is aesthetically Fleasing Erom Silver La�e Pc�--: and will be less disruptive from the tra " i� '�'-''• road. The Applicant wa= in aareement .. . - condition. (Staff eeport, Cucrier testimon�;` �.1. The City recommended that the con=e:,-"- � ' substantial progc?ss Eor constructicn of t�e :=ru;.=�'- '; undertaken within two years after apircval oE the Per-:' and completed within five years. Accordina to the Cit;, if the project hzs not been completed in this time =__:.^., the Pecmit should be reviewed by the E�:erett Plan^:c: Department fo[ eithec .n ex`�=c:-i�:r, cr .. t�z:�nic��i^.^• �- t'.;e Permit. (Staff r�_:crtl