Laserfiche WebLink
y�r <br />��� <br />A�x <br />C N <br />9Hti <br />r <br />y�H <br />K n <br />H� <br />oxo <br />�a ri �� <br />Vl H <br />hfO� <br />OH <br />��g <br />�j] V �] <br />H <br />Cy <br />Ny <br />gey <br />��� <br />HOtn <br />� <br />� <br />Allen Currie� <br />r_rr <br />5horeline htaragement P�e:r.it - , <br />Page -9- <br />7.4. As a consequenc� to the requi[ement tf;�t thece i�e �� <br />pedestrian lineal access along the shoreline, <br />Everett Pla•nina Department has rccommended that tl:e <br />Applicant elevate the living units adjacent to the <br />lineal pedestrian access in order to maintain the <br />�esidents' views and to avoid obstruction of the=e <br />views. According to the Everett Plannina Department, <br />the developer should submit detailed plans Eor revi��.� <br />and approval indicatiny a minimum of a six foot increas� <br />in height from the pedestrian walkway to the gceun-i <br />Eloor for the adjacent units of the lineal acces=. <br />These units should have a minimum finished floor <br />elevation of 35' tased upon the Applicant's surve��. <br />(Staff report) <br />;5. The Applicant suc,Titted that it is his intention to <br />increase the height of the buildinas fou: fe?t above th�� <br />fedestrian walkway to the groun8 floor of adjar.�c' <br />units. Hewever, these buildinos will be setback fr.rr <br />the w�lkway 30', and with the natural tcpoaraphy, <br />resident sitting or standing in the �nit would have _:�� <br />ur.obstructed vi=w of the Fedestrian traffic. (Curr: r <br />testimony) <br />26. As part of the develupment of �he lineal access, <br />Cit}• has recommended that the d�velopec be required <br />plant and maintain a structucal. oe vegetative barr: � <br />not less than Eive feet in height along the waterEr <br />between the publ.ic access area and the pcoF�. <br />structur?s in ocder to create a visual and s�- <br />baecier. In addition, the City requested that <br />Applicant provide rear yard space per unit adjacen[ _ <br />the shoceline or at least 15' in depth. (StaEE report) <br />27. The Applicant submitted that it is his intent to <br />maintain a setback fro� the pedestrian walkway utilizing <br />natural vegetation foc landscaping. It is his intent to <br />provide as much visual access for th� site residents <br />adjacent. to the walkway, and, claimed the reauir=ment as <br />proposed by the City for a structnral or vegetativP <br />barrier would be obtrusive to the residen*.s oE the <br />development. (Cucrier testimony) <br />28. Thece is a lagoon that is located in the northwestern <br />porticn oE the subject property. The Everett Plannina <br />Department ha= requestPd that the Aoplicant :nstall ar.d <br />provide an easement to the Ci[y for a public access <br />across the layoon. This access would Ce in the focr of <br />a bridge steucture that w�,ul.�-? te built c� ri'.ina.=, anc be <br />a minimum of 10' in w i :'i. , ., . . ; *.. r : _ .._. <br />er.d. (�toff �^cn�t� <br />