My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
1716 121ST ST SE 2016-01-01 MF Import
>
Address Records
>
121ST ST SE
>
1716
>
1716 121ST ST SE 2016-01-01 MF Import
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/27/2017 8:39:56 AM
Creation date
4/14/2017 10:33:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
121ST ST SE
Street Number
1716
Imported From Microfiche
Yes
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
51
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
BOARD OF ADJUS7'MENT <br />FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND ORDER <br />VARIANCE #I1-95 <br />Based upon tiie written requast for a variance from the Ciry's Zoning Code by. <br />Applicant: <br />Location: <br />ZoninF: <br />William Gustavson <br />1716 121st Street S E. <br />Everett, WA 98208 <br />1716 121st Street S.E. <br />R-3L, Multiple Family Residential <br />hereinafter referced to as "applicant," for a variance from Section I I of the City's Use <br />Standards Table which requires a m�nimum setback of 20 feet for structures from the rear <br />property line. The applicant is proposing to construct two new four-plexes on the south <br />portion of the site with a 5 foot setback from the rear propeny line. <br />I.and Use: Three existing duplexes are located on the site. <br />Exhibits: <br />I . Vicinity Map <br />2. Site Plan <br />3. Narrative Statement <br />4. McManus Letter <br />FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS: <br />Criterion No. 1: <br />That the variance is necessary because oti e��eptinnal or eztraurdtnary circumstances regarding <br />the size, shape, topography, or location of the sub�ect propeny; or the location of a pre- <br />existing improvement on the subject propeny that contormed to the zoning code in eH'ect when <br />the improvement H•^s constructed. <br />a. Findinas: The subject property is an approximately 1.5 acre site. The subject <br />property was rezoned in January 1995 from R-3 to R-3L in an area wide rezone. <br />The R-3 zone allows a reduced rear setback of 5 feet when a courtyard is provided <br />in multiple family developments. The R-3L zone which is an even lower density <br />than the R-3 zone does not contain the same provision as the R-3 zone for a <br />reduced rear yard setback when providing a courtyard area. <br />b. Conclusions: The R-3L zone is less intensive than the densities allowed in the <br />R-3 zoning designation yet requires a greater rear setback for structures. The <br />Planning Department has recognaed this as a conflict within the current 'Loning <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.