1716 121ST ST SE 2016-01-01 MF Import

Code and is proposing re�isions to ihis section along with other sections of'the code. Criterion No. 2: 7'hat the ��arience will not be materially detrimental to the propeny in the area of the subject property or to the City as a whole. e. Findin¢s: A letter conceming the protection of the wetland areas located alonu thc western ponion of the subject property was submitted ISee Exhibit #4). These concerns have been addressed throu�th the environmental review (SEPA#35-95) of the proposal and adequate protection for these resources required through the conditions of that decision. b. Conclusions: The proposed variance should not be detrimental to surroundine properties or the City. ` Criterion No. 3: ThaP the variance �vill only grant the subject propeny the same general rights enjoyed by other property in the same area and zone as the subject property. a. Fin in : Much of the surrounding area wus developed under the R-3 zoning designation which provided for a reduction of the standard 20 foot rear yard setback b. Conclu�ion�: The granting of the variance would allow for building setbacks similar to existing multiple family development proposnls. Criterion No. 4: That the variance is the minimum necessary to allow the subject propeny the general rights described in Criterion 3. a. Fin in : See Criteria #3. b. Conclusions: See Criteria #3 Criterion No. 5: The granting of the variance is consistent with the goals and policies of the Everett General Plan. a. Fi 'n : The Everet! Gencral Plan designates this property as 1.5, Multiple Family Residential. b. Conetu i ns• The granting of the v�riance is consistent with the goals and policies of the Everett General Plan.