1802 75TH ST SW METRICOM 2018-01-02 MF Import

3. The Impact of traffic generated by the proposed use on the surrounding area, pedestrian circulation and public safety; and the ability of the proponent to mitigate such potential Impacts. Finding: The proposal may generate some minimal traffic noise associated with the initial installation and set-up of the antennas, however, once the facility is operating, no additional traffic will be generated. Conclusion: There will be no adverse traffic impacts generated by the proposal. 4. The provision of adequate off-street parking, on -site circulation, and site access. Finding: The facility Is unmanned and therefore does not require any permanent on -site parking. Conclusion: No; applicable. 5. Compatibl,ity of proposed structures and Improvements with surrounding properties, including the size, helgh location, setback and arrange, ent of all proposed buildings and facilities, especially as they relate to light and shadow Impacts on more sensitive land uses and less Intensive zones. Flndinq_ The proposed antennas will be erected on an existing 160' monopole. The surrounding area is developed with mainly industrial uses. The proposed antennas will be placed at a height of 120' above grade. The existing pole contains two similar antenna structures at heights of 140' and 157' above grade. The proposed antennas would be approximately three feet (T) high by ten inches (10") wide. Due to their placement on the existing pole, the antennas would be somewhat visible from the surrounding properties. An equipment cabinet, similar in size to the one existing on site, is proposed at the base of the monopole. Conclusion: Due to placement on an existing monopole, the proposal should have no impacts to surrounding land uses.. 6. The number, size and location of signs, especially as they relate to more sensitive land uses. Finding: No signage is proposed at this time, however any new signage will require a sign permit compliant with the City of Everett Zoning Code. Conclusion: Not applicable. 7. 1'he landscaping, buffering and screen,ng of buildings, parking, loading and storage areas, especially as t iey relate to more sensitive land uses. Finding: The components associated with the proposal will be erected on an existing developed site. All existing landscaping, buildings, parking, loading and storage areas will remain unchanged. Conclusion: Not applicable. 8. The generation of nuisance Irritants such as noise, smoke, dust, odor, glare, visual blight or other undesirable Impacts. Finding_ The proposed facility is unmanned and does no! emit any known health hazards, toxic cnemicals, risk of fire and explosion or hazardous materials. Conclusion: The equipment clusteu has the potential to generate some noise. The equipment cou'nel must be acoustically shielded so as to minimize noise impacts on the adjacent properties. P. Consistency with the goals and policies of the Everett General Plan for the area and land use designation in which the property is located.