My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010/05/19 Council Agenda Packet
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2010
>
2010/05/19 Council Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/19/2017 9:11:35 AM
Creation date
4/19/2017 9:10:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Agenda Packet
Date
5/19/2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
180
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1• <br /> characteristics of available land may not precisely match the requirements of the market <br /> at a particular time). <br /> 7. the South Everett Industrial Land Analysis includes the following recommendations: <br /> • <br /> 1. Given the City's recognition in the Comprehensive Plan of the importance of <br /> industrial lands as an economic resource, the City should not, as a policy, allow for <br /> - conversion of industrial designated lands except in special circumstances related to <br /> the suitability of specific sites for industrial use. - <br /> 2. The current standard expressed in the Comprehensive Plan Policy that <br /> conversion of lands be discouraged unless industrial development is not feasible, <br /> should be reconsidered. An alternative condition might be that "industrial lands <br /> cannot be converted to other uses unless it can be demonstrated that the <br /> characteristics of the site do not match requirements for size, shape, topography, <br /> access, an4 context.°' <br /> - ----- --- - - -- -- ----- - - - - <br /> 3. Industrial designations under the City zoning code generally can accommodate <br /> the type of industrial development that would likely occur. However, the three <br /> industrial zones are quite similar in terms of what is allowed. The differences between <br /> M-1 Office and Industrial Park and M-2 Heavy Industry differ somewhat in terms of <br /> allowable uses (with M-2 allowing certain lower compatibility uses), but few <br /> differences in terms of development standards. An office and industrial park zone that <br /> encourages office and R&D uses by providing for greater landscape standards and <br /> building requirements, will accommodate users seeking a higher quality of life <br /> environment, attract higher wage employment, and accelerate development of a new <br /> generation of buildings. The City should seek to accommodate the,large industrial <br /> and warehouse distribution uses, while providing an alternative opportunity for the <br /> higher wage jobs and higher quality of life environment. The M-1 zone responds to <br /> the first objective, but not the latter. A new office and industrial park zoning <br /> designation that limits large warehouse/distribution centers, and provides more <br /> restrictive site and building standards, could supplement the M-1 zone and attract the <br /> higher wage uses. <br /> 8. the Planning Commission held a Public Hearing on December 15,2009,to consider the <br /> relevancy of the Comprehensive Plan Industrial Land Use policies as they pertain to the <br /> CEMEX application and to make a recommendation to the City Council; and <br /> 9. the Planning Commission packet for the December 15,2009 public hearing included a <br /> draft resolution recommending that the City Council deny the CEMEX application based <br /> upon findings and conclusion related to the relevant industrial land use policies; and <br /> 10. at the end of the Planning Commission public hearing on December 15,2009, CEMEX <br /> stated verbally that they were withdrawing their application; and <br /> 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.