Laserfiche WebLink
Response to Comments <br />CEMEX Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement <br />November 30, 2009 <br />17. Michael Zelinski <br />land use Planner <br />Writes in support of the proposal. <br />Response: Thank you for your comment. <br />19. Bob Tiscareno, AIA <br />Tiscareno Associates <br />Mr. Tiscareno comments in favor of the proposal generally and points to how the proposal would <br />support sustainable development patterns and transit oriented development specifically. <br />Staff Note: Mr. Tiscareno's firm produced the current site plan and Design Guidelines & <br />Standards for the proposal. <br />Response: Thank you for your comments. <br />21. Derrick Davis <br />Mr. Davis comments in favor of the proposal. He suggests certain provisions be made part of <br />any future PDO (development land use agreement between property owner and City, known as a <br />Planned Development Overlay) so as to protect interests of surrounding residential property <br />owners. He seeks to protect views from encroachment by tall buildings, roofs should be of <br />natural colors, as compared to the "aesthetic damage" certain industrial building have caused, <br />outdoor lights should point down to protect the night sky, industrial zones should be reviewed <br />and made to better support higher paying and high tech jobs (add to community value), homes <br />built on the proposed mixed use site should be aimed at the "prime" real-estate market. <br />Response: Thank you for your comments. <br />23. Tom Norcott <br />Lists several reasons for supporting the proposal, including the design, proposed traffic calming <br />measures, aesthetics, the inclusion of affordable housing, a reduction in truck traffic and more <br />parks. <br />Response: Thank you for your comments. <br />Chapter 1 — General Comments <br />2 <br />