Laserfiche WebLink
Response to Comments <br />CEMEX Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement <br />November 30, 2009 <br />Chapter 2 <br />Traffic Comments and City Responses <br />Comments are arranged by topic, in chronological order by date received, with most recent <br />listed first. <br />9. Richard Wilson, Food Services of America <br />Mr. Wilson seeks clarification on traffic estimates found in the November 12, 2008 CEMEX <br />Traffic Study by Gibson Traffic Consulting. <br />Response: <br />Dongho Chang, City Traffic Engineer, in response to the Food Services of America letter dated <br />October 26, 2009, and the applicant's Traffic Engineer's input, offers the following comments: <br />Food Service of America Letter Response: <br />la) Land Use 230 (Residential Condominium/Townhouse) clearly spells out that it is <br />appropriate for land uses with multiple ownership units in a single structure, including both low <br />and high rise developments. It may be appropriate to use Land Use 231 (Low -Rise Residential <br />Condominium/Townhouse) for this project, although the sample size is quite small. Land Use <br />210 (Single -Family Detached Housing) clearly states that it applies to stand-alone structures on <br />separate ownership lots, rather than the multiple family residential structures, so it is not <br />necessarily appropriate to use this land use for the analysis of the multi -family component of the <br />rezone. <br />lb) Land Use 223 (Mid -Rise Apartment) applies to apartment developments with between 3 and <br />10 stories (not 5 to 10 stories are indicated in the FSA letter). This land use has a small sample <br />size from an isolated area, so there are probably more reliable land uses for this type of <br />development. Land Use 220 (Apartment) is a broader category that applies to a wider range of <br />development types with a larger sample size and may be more appropriate for this analysis. <br />Chapter 2 — Traffic Comments <br />11 <br />