My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010/05/26 Council Agenda Packet
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2010
>
2010/05/26 Council Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2023 3:55:47 PM
Creation date
4/19/2017 11:06:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Agenda Packet
Date
5/26/2010
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1073
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
CEMEX Property DSEIS 09-001 <br />Comprehensive Plan amendment and rezone <br />October 8"' 2009 <br />3. Design Standards Street + Urban Space Standards page 24: Under the description of <br />a LANE the last sentence "No street parking is allowed to a lane" My question or <br />concern is that there be adequate parking on site for each individual property so they <br />don't block the street or sidewalk as illustrated in the drawing to the right of the page <br />noted. This is also referenced on page 106, zoning requirements for Residential <br />Standards, noting a 20 -foot minimum setback for a Garage from the ROW. I would <br />hope that if a car were parked in the driveway that it would not block the sidewalk or <br />extend out into the street. Where do visitors park if they can't park on the street? <br />4. Design Standards Sustainability page 126 and Green Building Practices: Last <br />sentence under this topic says, "For Glenwood to become a Built Green certified <br />community, all homes must be built to the one -star level" Does that mean they must <br />be or it would be nice if they were? <br />5. Parkland oven -space as shown: Reference Glenwood Design Standards, page 5. <br />How will the proposed parkland open -space shown be developed (by the city?) as far <br />as specific amenities, especially on the steep slope at the south side of the Sievers <br />Ducey Boulevard? <br />Thank you in advance for addressing our questions and concerns. As we mentioned <br />previously we are in favor of this rezone and will support this overall master design as <br />proposed. We think the redevelopment proposed will be good for the neighborhood and the <br />city of Everett. <br />Sincerely, <br />Michael Barthol, AIA <br />5106 El Charlee Street <br />Everett, WA 98203 <br />cc: CJ Ebert, Harbor Mountain Development <br />Page 2 of 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.