My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010/05/26 Council Agenda Packet
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2010
>
2010/05/26 Council Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2023 3:55:47 PM
Creation date
4/19/2017 11:06:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Agenda Packet
Date
5/26/2010
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1073
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Criteria <br />Ranking <br />Agree Neutral Disagree Score <br />B. RESIDENTIAL ATTRIBUTES <br />The suitability of a site for residential uses may depend upon its location, orientation, size and overall relationship to <br />its surroundings. Projects to be located on small parcels that are effectively isolated within industrial/commercial <br />areas would be discouraged. The following criteria address the aspects of the proposal that help define the <br />connection to the community: <br />4. Site/area abuts compatible uses 4 3 2 1 0 <br />■ One or more sides of the site abut existing residential, commercial or public uses that are typically considered <br />compatible to residential use <br />■ Allowable activities that abut the site or share a street frontage provide no greater noise, traffic, odors, <br />lighting or activity greater than would be expected in residential or commercial (non -industrial) areas <br />■ Comments: <br />S. Site is logical extension of residential area 4 3 2 1 0 <br />■ Site configuration presents a suitable connection to compatible uses and does not protrude into or disrupt a <br />contiguous and logical arrangement of industrial commercial properties <br />■ Site appears as a logical infill that evens out borders between less compatible uses <br />■ Comments: <br />6. Provides substantial housing near jobs 4 3 2 1 0 <br />■ The site is well situated for convenient access to substantial and varied employment opportunities <br />■ Comments: <br />7. Site can provide substantial unit yield at suitable density 4 3 2 1 0 <br />■ The site is large enough to create a substantial number of units to offset a loss of industrial acreage <br />■ The site and unit density is sufficient to produce the desired inclusion of affordable housing Where transit <br />options are available, the site can yield a suitable higher density by project design and product type <br />• Comments: <br />SUBTOTAL: Residential Attributes (Possible 16 points) B� <br />The site is generally suitable for residential conversion, based upon criteria associated with general residential <br />aspects of the site. Comments: <br />C. ENVIRONMENTAL COMPATIBILITY <br />The introduction of housing into industrial areas may present risk of exposure of residents to potential hazardous <br />conditions or other incompatible industrial/commercial activities. The following criteria address the aspects of the <br />proposal that help determine environmental quality and general livability of the proposal. <br />8. Does not abut incompatible industrial area 4 3 2 1 0 <br />■ Residential development of the site will not subject residents to existing or allowable industrial activities that <br />are considered incompatible by environmental and land use standards (noise, odors, et al) <br />■ Residential site edges are not compromised by abutting industrial development or activity of industrial <br />streetscapes <br />■ Comments: <br />9. Does not subject residents to adverse health risks 4 3 2 1 0 <br />■ Residential development of the site does not create an adverse health and safety for residents <br />■ Residential development of the site does not create unanticipated liabilities or limitations for existing or <br />allowable industrial users in the vicinity due to restrictive regulatory requirements <br />t:Wll StaffWarisaWlanning Criteria Evaluation Checklist Final PC rev 06-09-04.doc <br />City of Santa Clara, California <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.