My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2010/05/26 Council Agenda Packet
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2010
>
2010/05/26 Council Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/26/2023 3:55:47 PM
Creation date
4/19/2017 11:06:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Agenda Packet
Date
5/26/2010
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
1073
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Criteria <br />Ranking <br />Agree Neutral Disagree Score <br />16 Site can take advantage of transit 4 3 2 1 0 <br />■ The site is located within %2 mile of a transit node (rail station, light rail station, major bus stop) <br />■ Development can provided shuttle services to facilitate transit connections <br />■ Comments: <br />SUBTOTAL: Availability of Services (Possible 20 points) D� <br />The site is generally suitable for residential conversion, based upon criteria associated with the convenience of <br />typical residential services in the vicinity. Comments: <br />E. OTHER PLANNING CONSIDERATIONS <br />The conversion from employment to housing should not adversely impact the City's fiscal and economic situation. <br />17 Added housing displaces low-density jobs site(s) 4 3 2 1 0 <br />■ The existing site development underutilizes the site and its environment <br />■ The existing low-density job conditions of the site are inappropriate for the area and higher density residential <br />or mixed use could well serve the area <br />• Comments: <br />18. Existing development is outdated/underutilized 4 3 2 1 0 f� <br />• The economic life or industrial value of the site improvements are failing significantly <br />• Substantial investment in site infrastructure is needed for reasonable on-going use of the site <br />• Comments: <br />19. Conversion should be revenue neutral or positive for City 4 3 2 1 0 <br />■ Residential conversion would result in a neutral or positive balance, based upon a comparative fiscal <br />evaluation of taxes and services <br />■ Comments: <br />20. Viability of adjacent employment uses are not threatened 4 3 2 1 0 <br />• Conversion will not foster further unintended conversion of surrounding industrial properties <br />• Residential use will not create hardships for neighboring employment <br />■ Comments: <br />SUBTOTAL: Other Planning Considerations (Possible 16 points) E� <br />The site is generally suitable for residential conversion, based upon criteria associated with various <br />considerations relevant to decisions on the conversion. Comments: <br />ABCDETotal <br />SUMMARY COMMENTS: <br />City of Santa Clara, California <br />I:\All Staff\Marisa\Planning Criteria Evaluation Checklist Final PC rev 06-09-04.doe 4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.