Resolution 3550 - Laserfiche WebLink

Space, Parks and Recreation Plan, Everett Community Plan, Shoreline Master Program, and other plans formally adopted by the city of Everett. and that, according to WAC 197-11-660, the mitigation measures imposed are limited to: a. Measures based on policies, plans, rules, or regulations formally designated by the agency . . . b. Mitigation measures shall be related to specific, adverse environmental impacts clearly identified in an environmental document and shall be stated in writing by the decisionmaker. The decisionmaker shall cite the agency SEPA policy that is the basis of any condition . . . c. Mitigation measures shall be reasonable and capable of being accomplished. d. Responsibility for implementing mitigation measures may be imposed upon an applicant only to the extent attributable to the identified adverse impacts . . . Voluntary additional mitigation may occur. e. Before requiring mitigation measures, agencies shall consider whether local, state, or federal requirements and enforcement would mitigate an identified significant impact. 3 . WHEREAS, the City Council finds that in response to the comments received during the comment period and review of the Everett General Comprehensive Plan, and in response to the voluntary mitigation proposed by LOJIS in their Parking Study correspondence, a Revised Mitigated Determination of Non-Significance (Revised MDNS) was issued September 10, 1991. 4. WHEREAS, the City Council finds that an appeal of the Revised MDNS was received September 18, 1991 from Arnold Hofmann. The following issues were appealed: * The form of mitigation for providing 10 additional parking spaces by way of an agreement at a near-by parking facility. * This was considered inadequate because the use of such existing parking spaces would put "additional pressure on the remaining existing spaces. " * The form of mitigation for informing tenants of unlimited time limits with a map was inadequate because it "only takes up parking which is already in short supply in this area. " Comments were also made regarding the parking standards for the R-4 zoning district across the alley. * Mitigation in the form of posting or funding parking time-limit signs, if the City decides that parking time-limits are necessary, was considered inadequate because it would be a "loss of parking for those who are currently utilizing the spaces. " * That the probable need for loading zones was ignored and that such loading zones would "come out of existing unlimited parking spaces. " 2 cibyffcr