My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 3550
>
Resolutions
>
Resolution 3550
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/25/2017 10:00:31 AM
Creation date
4/25/2017 10:00:28 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Resolutions
Resolution Number
3550
Date
10/30/1991
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
spaces. " <br /> Finding: As stated in the General Plan, "Because it is important for <br /> businesses, institutions, employers, and cultural facilities to be <br /> readily accessible to the public, the City should encourage various <br /> forms of transportation access (pedestrian, public transit, and <br /> automobile) to achieve a high level of service to the CBD and: . . . <br /> *Minimize the need for private developers to provide individual <br /> on-site parking_ Encourage them instead to participate in <br /> expanded puhlic transit , car pool , and transportation system <br /> management programs and/or the construction of new parking <br /> structures. " <br /> Finding: The zoning code, adopted in December of 1989, implemented <br /> portions of this goal through a reduction in parking standards in the <br /> B-3 zone. The residential parking standard in the B-3 Zoning District <br /> is .5 spaces per dwelling unit. (Section 22 , page 22-07 Use-Standards <br /> Table: Multiple family dwellings) . No parking is required for retail <br /> uses under 10,000 square feet in area. (Section 22 , page 22-02 <br /> Use-Standards Table: Retail sales Special Regulation 5) <br /> Finding: SEPA Mitigation Measure Number Five of the Revised MDNS (SEPA <br /> #61-91) , in response to concerns expressed in the comment period, <br /> field observations identifying parking demand due to surrounding land <br /> uses and lack of parking time limits, and the applicant's voluntary <br /> proposal , requires that an agreement be provided to the city showing <br /> that additional off-street parking will be made available. The <br /> requirements of the Mitigation Measure assure that the agreement must <br /> be satisfactory and that the parking spaces will, in fact, be <br /> available before the Certificate of Occupancy is issued. <br /> Finding: According to the Comprehensive Plan, "The City should <br /> encourage a variety of housing types within and surrounding the <br /> downtown core area by: <br /> * Encouraging buildings which combine residential units with <br /> non-residential uses. <br /> * Consider modifying parking standards of residential uses in <br /> the Central City area to allow more efficient use of land <br /> and account for a greater use of pedestrian and transit <br /> methods of transportation. " <br /> Finding: The zoning code, when it was adopted in December of 1989, <br /> did change the parking standards from 1-1/2 spaces per dwelling unit <br /> for multi-family uses - a standard for any part of the City - to 1/2 <br /> space per dwelling unit in the B-3 zoning district. <br /> Finding: The alternatives described by LOJIS to address the provision <br /> of an additional ten off-site parking spaces include: use of the "Bon <br /> Garage" or working with an adjacent land owner to convert a vacant <br /> lot into a parking lot that meets all standards including landscaping <br /> to provide ten additional parking spaces. <br /> 4 <br /> clbyffcr <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.