Resolution 3528 - Laserfiche WebLink

• The mitigation program explicitly permits a refocus of mitigation resources if necessary to assure timely construction of public transportation facilities. Conclusions: • The mitigation program will be generally consistent in timing with Boeing Expansion and does not require modification. • Required TDM measures to reduce SOV use for each development sector of the Boeing Master Development Plan is an appropriate mitigation measure. • The mitigation imposed is supported by the record and meets SEPA requirements. • Appellants' allegations are not supported by the record. Decision: Deny the appeal and affirm the mitigation requirements with regard to the above issue. SECTION 25: ALTERNATIVE PHASING PLAN FOR BOEING EXPANSION Findings: • The Boeing Expansion was proposed by the applicant and reviewed by the City as a "Master Plan" development instead of a number of smaller building permits and individual SEPA reviews for individual structures. • The Master Plan approach facilitates identification of cumulative impacts from the total project and the identification of appropriate mitigation requirements. It also provides the applicant with the advantage of having addressed and provided fair-share mitigation of impacts for the entire development prior to issuance of permits. • Public agencies are responsible for the proper execution of many of the offsite mitigation measures and for the proper application of the mitigation payments. • The City's Interim Traffic Mitigation Ordinance (ITMO) contains the City's most specifically articulated mitigation requirements and is the City's formally adopted traffic mitigation policy. 39