My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 6527
>
Resolutions
>
Resolution 6527
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/30/2013 4:26:17 PM
Creation date
9/30/2013 4:26:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Resolutions
Resolution Number
6527
Date
8/8/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
101
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4. Current multifamily housing projects are occurring in the lower density multifamily <br /> zones or at densities lower than the maximum level allowed. <br /> 5. The best TDR opportunities based on the combination of current zoning provisions <br /> and recent development characteristics are: <br /> C-2ES zone near the Everett Station where no residential (other than live-work <br /> units or projects on sites two acres or larger) is currently allowed and where a <br /> major transit station and related public investment in place. <br /> C-1 and B-2 zones (proposed MUO and E-1 zones on Evergreen Way) <br /> R-3 zone which is extensive and where the current allowed density is low. <br /> R-2 zone where duplexes could be allowed on smaller lots. <br /> R-1 zone where cottages could be developed at twice current densities. <br /> 6. The strongest market opportunities for higher density new development that might <br /> benefit from TDR's are sites that offer unique and scarce features, thus justifying a <br /> cost premium; and in zones where existing development is at allowable maximum <br /> densities. <br /> 7. The market should support mixed use projects with multifamily residential <br /> development, as well as single purpose residential buildings. <br /> 8. Six scenarios provide a combination of the identified zoning and market <br /> opportunities; opportunities that are site-specific in most cases, but reflective of <br /> opportunities throughout a zone. <br /> 9. The financial analysis addresses whether the TDR bonus scenarios are feasible, <br /> whether there is an incentive to purchase development rights to achieve the bonus <br /> density, and the appropriate value to place on development rights. <br /> 10. A project is considered to be feasible if its value at completion exceeds the <br /> development cost by an amount equal to 10% of the development cost. <br /> 11. The higher density scenarios achieve improved economic performance in most cases, <br /> but fall short of the targeted entrepreneurial return of 10%. For many scenarios, the <br /> target return could be achieved with realistic potential increases in rent. <br /> 12. The scenario that performs the best is the E-1 MUO. <br /> 13. The E-1 MUO scenario could support a price per gross square foot of TDR at $5.23, <br /> equivalent to a transfer rate of 2.9 square feet at the receiving end, assuming a <br /> sending site value of$15,000, and an average unit size of 1,000 gross square feet. <br /> 14. Ultimately it is the multifamily tax exemption program that makes the bonus schemes <br /> even marginally feasible. <br /> EVERETT TRANSFER OF DEVELOPMENT RIGHTS STUDY FINAL REPORT <br /> PROPERTY COUNSELORS PAGE 8 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.