My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2012/07/25 Council Agenda Packet
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2012
>
2012/07/25 Council Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/15/2017 10:54:10 AM
Creation date
5/15/2017 10:51:22 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Agenda Packet
Date
7/25/2012
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
580
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
bull terriers test better than golden retrievers on some occasions.22The <br /> information provided by the test can thus be an extremely persuasive tool in <br /> shaping good legislation. <br /> Fiscal Bite: The High Cost of Breed Discrimination <br /> Government officials need to understand that they are incurring significant costs <br /> when they enact breed-discriminatory laws. Even before costly DNA testing <br /> entered the picture—the cost varies from $125-$200 per dog— breed- <br /> discriminatory laws were found to be expensive, but city officials gave little <br /> thought to the implementation of these laws. <br /> In 1997, Prince George's County in Maryland enacted CB-104-1996, which banned <br /> pit-bull dogs. In 2002, CR-68-2002 created the Vicious Animal Legislation Task <br /> Force to evaluate the effectiveness of existing legislation and administrative <br /> regulations concerning vicious animals and to advise the county on improvements <br /> and amendments to current policies or laws. The task force found that the cost to <br /> the Animal Management Division for maintenance of pit bulls over a two-year <br /> period was approximately $560,000. The task force found the breed- <br /> discriminatory policy to be inefficient, costly, difficulty to enforce, subjective and <br /> questionable in results. It recommended repealing the breed-specific ban.23 <br /> Despite these findings, Prince George's County has yet to repeal its breed ban. <br /> The county impounds more than 900 "pit bulls" per year. On average, more than <br /> 80 percent of the "pit bulls" impounded are maintained by the Animal <br /> Management Division throughout a lengthy hearing process and eventually <br /> euthanized merely because of their appearance.24 <br /> As the Prince George's County experience attests, the rising costs of enforcing <br /> breed-discriminatory measures in these austere times should encourage officials <br /> to contemplate the fiscal impact of enacting such laws. <br /> 22 Stefanie A.Ott,Esther Schalke,Amelie M.Von Gaertner,Hansjoachim Hackbarth,Is There a Difference?Comparison of Golden <br /> Retrievers and Dogs Affected by Breed-Specific Legislation Regarding Aggressive Behavior, Journal of Veterinary Behavior 3,134-140(2008). <br /> 23 Report of the Vicious Animal Legislation Task Force,Presented to Prince George's County Council, July 2003. <br /> 24 Supra,at 6. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.