Laserfiche WebLink
Port of Everett SHANNON 6WILSON,INC. <br /> Attn: Mr. Erik Gerking <br /> April 16,2013 <br /> Page 2 of 5 <br /> GROUND SETTLEMENT <br /> Using IBC ground motion design criteria,we estimated the ground settlement that could occur <br /> due to liquefaction at the site. The settlement was estimated using empirical methods and <br /> laboratory index test results from the borings performed for the project. The results of our <br /> analyses indicated that 2 to 8 inches of ground settlement could occur during the IBC design <br /> ground motion. This settlement will result in downward forces on the sheet pile bulkhead, <br /> structure foundations, and utilities. Depending on the bearing depth of foundations, this could <br /> also result in settlement of the bulkhead and structures. The settlement would not be uniform and <br /> could cause damage to utilities located behind the bulkhead. <br /> LATERAL SPREADING <br /> Lateral spreading occurs when a sloped site or a site near a free-face (such as the bulkhead) <br /> moves toward the free face as underlying soils liquefy. This phenomenon has been experienced <br /> at numerous waterfront facilities during a seismic event. We used a published paper based on <br /> empirical methods to evaluate the potential lateral displacement that could occur(Youd et al., <br /> 2002) during the IBC design ground motion. Youd et al. (2002) uses multiple empirical case <br /> histories and developed a relationship for lateral movement as related to the earthquake <br /> characteristics, thickness of liquefied soil, composition of liquefied soil, and configuration of the <br /> sloping ground. Using the procedure presented in the Youd et al. (2002), for the conditions at <br /> the project site, we estimate lateral displacements of about 2 to 3 inches at approximately 100 <br /> feet from the wall face during the IBC design ground motion. Although this method is not <br /> recommended to evaluate locations closer to the wall, lateral displacements will progressively <br /> increase at locations closer to the wall (potentially as large as 2 to 3 feet at the wall face). <br /> Two other published methods (Gazetas et al., 1990 and McCullough and Dickenson, 1998) <br /> present lateral spreading estimates for anchored sheet pile walls. However,these methods <br /> assume that the anchor system provides resistance during a seismic event. For the East Marina <br /> site, the deadman anchors are founded within the soil layers that are anticipated to liquefy during <br /> the design IBC ground motion,thereby resulting in a significant loss of resistance. Therefore <br /> the methods outlined in Gazetas et al. and McCullough and Dickenson would likely <br /> underestimate the lateral ground displacement. These methods are summarized as follows: <br />