Laserfiche WebLink
Project File M&N#:8057-03 <br /> 24 March 2015 Site Visit Memorandum <br /> 90-degree face bars were not installed, and the terminated bars did not include T-heads. Mike P. <br /> Noted that they did not have T-head bars on site, I told him bars with 90-degree hooks would be <br /> an acceptable substitute (see Figure 4). <br /> 3) The vertical bars in the pile cap (at the viewing platform seat, Detail 2/S3.1)were positioned too <br /> far towards the water and would not have adequate cover on the waterside face.These bars <br /> were also positioned too high, reducing the cover at the top face (see Figure 5). <br /> 4) Some of the stirrup sets had either too large or too small of spacing(see Figure 6). <br /> 5) The sloped portion of the pile cap connecting to the existing 14th Street Bulkhead was measured <br /> to be 44'-5"from WP#1 instead of the specified 40'-0".This will not cause any conflict with the <br /> future handrail posts, and places the slope break point at the edge of a handrail plinth. <br /> (2)#4 <br /> #4 @ 12"OC <br /> #4 @ 12"OC <br /> @12"OC SINGLE PIECE <br /> T&B I 2„ STIRRUP TIE <br /> I <br /> CLR I REVEAL,TYP <br /> 0 <br /> 60 <br /> z a <br /> CM O N6-3"CLR <br /> \ € TYp �-CONT DRIP <br /> ti GROOVE <br /> I r ELECTRICAL <br /> CONDUIT <br /> (10)#7 CONT <br /> 2'.g" /, I <br /> TYP,UO—N-- I #5 STIRRUP @ 12" OC, <br /> ALTERNATE HOOKS,BURN HOLE <br /> THROUGH SHEET PILE 2"0 MAX <br /> Figure 1: Pour Area at Typical Pile Cap <br /> 2" <br /> BULKHEAD CAP 10- TOPPING SLAB <br /> (3)#5 Imo" <br /> _ 114"x3"BRG PAD, <br /> •F• CONT <br /> #4 @ 18"OC \ • <br /> ALTERNATE 6 fiy{ <br /> HOOKS <br /> II .IIA <br /> IL 1 (8)#7 � 11 <br /> J0 W #5 @ 12"OC <br /> 2'-6" ALTERNATE HOOKS, <br /> BURN HOLE THROUGH <br /> SHEET PILE 2"0 MAX <br /> Figure 2: Pour Area at Viewing Platform Seat <br /> ,/1' 2 <br />