Laserfiche WebLink
4 <br />Exhibit A to Ordinance No. <br />Central Waterfront Redevelopment Plan <br />O building design standards and guidelines <br />4. What type of uses should the re -use and redevelopment plan allow? <br />Top responses included: <br />uses that can coexist with public access <br />• uses that provide a large number of family wage jobs <br />o commercial uses, such as retail, restaurant, offices, entertainment <br />See Appendix 3 for a detailed sunuliary of responses to each question. See Appendix 4 for a <br />summary of written comments provided in conjunction with the questionnaire. <br />D. Compatibility with Port of Everett and Naval Station Everett Operations <br />Ordinance #3260-12 directed staff to consider in the reuse planning process the compatibility of <br />future uses with the operations of the Port of Everett maritime terminals and Naval Station <br />Everett. Each abuts the Kimberly-Clark mill site, separated fiom the mill property by a chain <br />link fence topped with barbed wire. Both facilities are secure facilities that are not open to the <br />general public. In discussions with both organizations, the overriding concern of each is <br />maintaining the safety and security of their facilities as the Kimberly-Clark mill site is <br />redeveloped. Each has expressed concent about public access to the inner harbor and the ability <br />of people to use the harbor for recreational boating or kayaking. Each has also expressed <br />concerns about increased opportunities for terrorist threats that could arise from increased access <br />by the general public. Each has indicated there will be a need for increased vigilance on their <br />part to monitor activities on the former mill site to protect the ongoing security of their facilities <br />and operations. <br />The Port of Everett has indicated they are considering the acquisition of the Kunberly-Clark mill <br />property. If the Port were to purchase the property, it would be to expand the capacity of their <br />maritime terminals. Naval Station Everett has indicated that they are not interested in <br />purchasing the property. <br />ID <br />Naval Station Everett submitted a formal comment letter dated August 14, 2012, stating concerns <br />about the potential impact of new uses on the site in proximity to the Naval Station (see <br />correspondence in Appendix 7). They requested 80 foot setbacks from their existing buildings <br />and parking areas, which would result in 30 — 46 foot setbacks ft om the shared Navy / Kimberly- <br />Clark property line to be consistent with current Department of Defense Anti -Terrorism Force <br />Protection policies. The Navy also requested that any proposed use be required to provide a <br />"comprehensive industrial site security and public safety plan as a condition of site approval," <br />with an opportunity for the Navy to provide input to the plan prior to City approval. The Navy <br />105 <br />