My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
2013/01/09 Council Agenda Packet
>
Council Agenda Packets
>
2013
>
2013/01/09 Council Agenda Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/8/2018 10:45:22 AM
Creation date
5/24/2017 9:44:55 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Council Agenda Packet
Date
1/9/2013
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
984
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
4 Exhibit A to Ordinance No. <br />Central Waterfront Redevelopment Plan <br />also expressed concerns about compatibility of specific uses and forms of public access, <br />summarized below: <br />• A facility that manufactures or stores explosive or flanunables would be an incompatible <br />use <br />• A facility that supports aircraft presence, such as a helipad, would be an incompatible use <br />• Windows on buildings facing north toward Naval Station Everett should be constructed <br />using opaque glass to preclude covert activities directed at the Navy <br />• Public access to the former Kimberly-Clark mill site should not be allowed due to <br />security concerns. At a subsequent discussion, the Navy indicated that public access <br />would be acceptable provided recreational users are kept out of the harbor, and that <br />public access areas maintain a minimum separation from facilities located on base. <br />• Future businesses that use electromagnetic frequencies in their operations should submit <br />an "EMR Frequency Spectrum Plan" for review by the Navy, with approval contingent <br />on compatibility with Navy operations <br />• Any use that requires additional marine traffic should submit a "Port Operations Plan" for <br />review by the Navy <br />• Any plans for proposed piers or wharfs should be submitted for review by the Navy to <br />ensure no impact to Navy operations <br />• Recreational boating uses in the harbor would be incompatible with Navy operations <br />The Navy also requested that standards be developed to address noise, glare, and late night <br />operations to prevent negative impact to Navy facilities. <br />E. Building Demolition and Site Cleanup <br />Kimberly-Clark has started to demolish buildings on the mill site and proposes to clean up any <br />contaminated soils as quickly as possible in order to prepare the site for re -use and <br />redevelopment. The company wants to leave a clean site that will allow a future user or users to <br />continue to provide business and employment opportunities on this waterfront property. The <br />moratorium on development during the planning process does not apply to demolition permits or <br />remediation activities. Most buildings will be removed from the site by early 2013. <br />Kimberly-Clark has worked closely with the Washington Department of Ecology and developed <br />an Agreed Order for conducting a remedial investigation, feasibility study and preparing a <br />cleanup action plan for the upland portion of the site. There are also contaminated sediments in <br />the East Waterway in the harbor abutting the site, including on submerged lands owned by <br />Kimberly-Clark. The in -water cleanup will take place on a separate track from the uplands, as <br />there are several responsible parties and in -water cleanup is more complicated. <br />E:3 <br />106 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.