Resolution 3326 - Laserfiche WebLink

Craig Van Sant Appeal 11-89 Page -2- 13. Request for Reconsideration filed by Brad Cattle, representing Craig Van Sant, dated 1/29/90 14. Letter to Paul Roberts, Planning Department, from JoAnne Wildman dated 2/8/90 15. Letter to JoAnne Wildman from Paul Roberts, Planning Department, dated 2/15/90 16. Order by James Driscoll Reconvening Hearing 17. Letter to James Driscoll from Terry Slatten, Carol Lively, and Mark Sullivan dated 2/18/90 18. Architectural Drawings of 4228 South Third 19. Letter from Jim Sheflo Sr. dated 2/21/90 20. Letter from Pam Sheflo dated 2/21/90 21. Letter from Kalvin L. Holler dated 2/21/90 22. Letter from Jim Sheflo Jr. dated 2/21/90 23. Letter from Pam Holler dated 2/21/90 24. Letter from Chris Sheflo dated 2/21/90 25. Letter to Ronald Cole from John Whitaker, Fire Inspector, dated 7/14/86 26. Letter to City of Everett from JoAnne Wildman-Conaway dated 10/22/85 27. General Provisions - Chapter 5.04 - Licenses The Findings of Facts and Conclusions as set forth in the January 12, 1990, decision remain effective. The following Findings of Facts pertain to the information as provided at the February 22, 1990, hearing: FINDINGS OF FACTS 1. The Applicant submitted that he operates a small business and it is his intent to use the subject property in conjunction with the small business. In addition, it is his intent to have three units of the structure be converted into living units. 2. The Applicant submitted that since 1979 he has owned a house across the street from the subject property, and during this time he observed the activity at the site which was a commercial activity done in conjunction with a neon sign business. His observations included: the loading and unloading of signs; the repair of trucks; the instruction of neon use and signage; and other commercial activity relating to the neon business. 3. The Applicant submitted that the previous owner of the subject property had employees at the subject property. 4. The Applicant submitted that based on the fact that employees were at the subject property and commercial activity occurred thereon, the use was for a commercial enterprise. 5. Testimony was received from a neon tube vendor who was a former employee of Ace Neon. The employee (Rodney Countryman) submitted that he worked at the subject property for a number of years and his work included loading and unloading of vehicles and other activities related to the neon business.