Laserfiche WebLink
CONCLUSION <br /> The Planning Department would administratively review <br /> I detailed plans for each phase at time of application for <br /> Building Permits through the SEPA review process. The <br /> applications would be reviewed per the SEPA policies in effect <br /> at time of submittal of the applications. The conditions in <br /> the concomitant agreement require that adequate notice be <br /> provided to the neighborhood during future review of detailed <br /> plans for each phase, and that input from the neighborhood be <br /> considered by staff prior to the Planning Department issuing a <br /> final SEPA decision for each phase. <br /> A subdivision will also be required for the single family <br /> plat. The subdivision will be reviewed per the Zoning <br /> Ordinance in effect on December 26, 1989 as modified by the <br /> conditions in the Concomitant Agreement to the rezone <br /> ordinance. <br /> FINDINGS <br /> Zoning/General Plan/Density: The General Plan <br /> designation for the site is 1 .5/Multiple Family at 10 to 15 <br /> dwellings per gross acre. <br /> The existing zoning of the site is R-S, Single Family <br /> Suburban Residential and R-1 , Single Family Low Density <br /> Residential . At time of application for the rezone, there was <br /> no zoning designation which implemented the General Plan <br /> designation. The proposal is a rezone to R-3(A) with a <br /> Concomitant Agreement which contains conditions to restrict <br /> development and implement the General Plan designation and <br /> policies. <br /> The Zoning Code approved by City Council on December 27, <br /> 1 1989 does include a zone which implements the General Plan <br /> designation - the R-3(L) zone. At time of adoption of the new <br /> Zoning Code, City Council approved a vesting provision which <br /> states that all rezones where a public hearing was held by the <br /> 8 <br />