Resolution 3284 - Laserfiche WebLink

would include detailed site plans, detailed soils/geotechnical analysis ( including slope stability analysis) , detailed drainage plans, detailed grading plans, and traffic studies. Each phase would be reviewed in accordance with the SEPA policies in effect at time of submittal of detailed plans for that phase. The site plans in these future reviews would be reviewed administratively by the Planning Department. Minor revisions to the site plan which comply with all conditions of approval listed in the concomitant agreement could be approved by the Planning Director. Major revisions or revisions which are not in conformance with the conditions of approval in the concomitant agreement would require new public hearings before Planning Commission and City Council . Public notice would be provided and input from the neighborhood would be accommodated during the detailed site plan reviews. Public notice would consist of posting of the site, mailing to the major neighborhood groups and notice in the newspaper per conditions in the concomitant agreement. The concomitant agreement lists one additional condition I which would require notice to the CARE neighborhood group. Condition 3 g. 1 would regulate clearing in the buffer areas. This condition requires the Applicant, Planning and Parks Department staff, and representatives of the CARE neighborhood group to meet in the field to discuss which trees in the buffer areas can be removed to allow construction of buildings, etc. abutting the buffers. In addition to the SEPA reviews, a subdivision will be required for the single family plat. The concomitant agreement includes a condition which states that the subdivision will be processed in accordance with the Zoning Ordinance in effect on December 26 , 1989 as modified by the conditions of the concomitant agreement. 7