Resolution 3280 - Laserfiche WebLink

• November 8, 1989 James M. Driscoll, Hearing Examiner City Hall 3002 Wetmore Avenue Everett, WA. 98201 Subject: Mumm Day Care Center, SPU 6-89 Dear Mr. Driscoll, I'm writing in the matter of the Special Property Use Permit application filed by Patricia and David Mumm and Teresa Nelson for their property located at 6533 Beverly Lane, Everett Washington. This is a follow-up to my letter dated October 17, 1989 which was made part of the official record in the Findings and Decision of the Hearing Examiner of the City of Everett dated November 2, 1989. While your ruling of November 2, 1989 concludes the site may be used as an expanded child day care center, one of the conditions set for this approval is an error of fact, or at the very minimum, a contradiction to your stated findings and conclusions. I'm referring to item number 3, listed under the heading "Decision". This statement reads "The parents must use the on-street marked parking spaces on the east side of Beverly Lane between Tamarack and Beech for drop off and pick up of children". I find no substantive support for this condition listed in the "Findings of Facts" or "Conclusions". For example, item 15 under the Facts section indicates "The use will not have a serious adverse effect on the ecology and/or environment of the community". I support this finding and see no justification to restrict usage of the driveway if in fact your review of the situation has concluded there are no adverse effects as a result of day care operation. Item 16 concludes that "there is a public need for adequate and good child care services [in Snohomish County)". In today's world the definition of "adequate and good" used by most concerned parents and officials would certainly include the terms "healthy and safe". By forcing parents to load and unload infants, toddlers and children on the side of Beverly Lane violates the common sense I hope is used as a