Resolution 3280 - Laserfiche WebLink

. 1 component of your offices' decision. This street, Beverly Lane, is quite busy as evidenced by the presence of multiple stoplights and bus stops. It would also force parents to carry their children along the sidewalk and up the lengthy driveway in inclement weather, exposing them to wind and rain and increasing the possibilities of resultant illness. Item 19. Mr. Drew Nielsen, in his statement for the opponent to the Special Property Use Permit, indicated "that traffic on the driveway creates problems for his clients in the early morning hours." 'These "problems" were not detailed and I can only assume he is referring to the sound created by car engines and doors. I find it incomprehensible that this statement would lead to a decision to disallow all cars from using the driveway at any time with the exception of the employees. To begin with, you've already stated that the use of this address for a child day care would not have a serious adverse effect on the community (item 15). At the outside I could see some kind of restriction of driveway use prior to 7:00 am but I see no reason for later morning and evening use restrictions. Furthermore, and most contradictory, your conclusion Number 5 (page 6), states "The facility is similar in appearance to a single family residence and does not generate excessive traffic, noise or other disruptions of use to other properties." Why then, if this is your conclusion, would you set down a condition that parents can not use the driveway? In summary Mr. Driscoll, I appeal for reconsideration of your Condition Number 3, as indicated above, on the basis of your own offices' findings and conclusions as well as the broader scope of doing what's in the best interests of our children's health and safety. Sincerely, Steven W. Weissenfluh 9522 62nd Dr. N.E. Marysville, WA. 98270