My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
Resolution 2879
>
Resolutions
>
Resolution 2879
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/1/2018 11:54:41 AM
Creation date
7/6/2017 11:31:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Resolutions
Resolution Number
2879
Date
6/10/1987
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
particles, gradually building up the cap, no displacement of <br /> contaminated material due to impact is expected to occur during the <br /> capping process. The quantity of contaminated sediments released is <br /> not expected to occur or to significantly affect nearby biota. The <br /> RADCAD dredging and disposal operations will be monitored closely <br /> during and after Phases I and II and over the long term to determine <br /> if adverse impacts are occurring and whether any remedial action <br /> would be required in the event that the CAD technique does not <br /> perform as anticipated. <br /> 2. Smith Island <br /> It should be noted that the three upland alternatives, considered <br /> here, have not been submitted for shoreline permit approval. If an <br /> upland disposal site is considered, a shoreline permit for that <br /> particular site must be submitted for approval. This specific <br /> application proposes confined aquatic disposal and alternatives are <br /> included for the purpose of comparison. <br /> There are three alternative methodologies for upland disposal <br /> discussed in the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Record of Decision: <br /> excavated saturated disposal, elevated disposal, and <br /> elevated/stabilized disposal. The alternatives would be performed on <br /> approximately 110 acres located about 4 miles north of the Homeport <br /> site (north edge of Smith Island, west of Highway 99). <br /> The alternatives are: <br /> a. Excavated/Saturated Disposal <br /> The excavated alternative would involve excavating a cell below <br /> the existing groundwater level which would be backfilled with <br /> contaminated sediments. These sediments would remain saturated <br /> and anaerobic over the long term. Saturation of the spoils <br /> keeps metals and other substances bonded to the material. If <br /> the dredge spoils are dried and are exposed to oxygen, there is <br /> a risk of release of toxic substances to the environment. <br /> b. Elevated Disposal <br /> The elevated version would involve placing the contaminated <br /> sediments above existing ground and the water table within a <br /> constructed perimeter dike. Because the contaminated sediments <br /> would eventually dry and oxidize, liners would have to be <br /> included in this alternative to contain potential leachate <br /> associated with the aerobic condition. A leachate collection <br /> system and a treatment facility to process any leachate <br /> collected would have to be included in the elevated design. <br /> c. Elevated/Stabilized Disposal <br /> The elevated/stabilized disposal version utilizes fly ash, <br /> gypsum or some other chemical stabilizer that is used for <br /> solidification of the contaminated material. This also <br /> involves placing the contaminated sediments above existing <br /> ground water and the water table. The solidifier is mixed with <br /> the stabilizer as it is placed on the site and allowed to <br /> harden to a cement-like consistency. <br /> -9- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.