My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
310 W CASINO RD 2017-08-11
>
Address Records
>
W CASINO RD
>
310
>
310 W CASINO RD 2017-08-11
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/11/2017 2:02:55 PM
Creation date
7/31/2017 2:51:29 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Address Document
Street Name
W CASINO RD
Street Number
310
Imported From Microfiche
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
209
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Acme Homes JN 15373 <br /> • September 2, 2015 Page 2 <br /> Subsurface Conditions <br /> During our visit, we monitored the excavation of three test pits at the approximate locations shown <br /> on the attached copy of the site plan. These test pits were evenly spaced along the length of the <br /> two potential infiltration trenches. Attached to this letter are the logs for the test pits. <br /> In all three test pits, we observed topsoil and a 2- to 3-foot layer of gravelly, silty, fine-grained sand. <br /> Underlying this loose, heavily-weathered silty soil was dense outwash gravelly sand. In Test Pit 1, <br /> this dense outwash extended to the 9-foot depth of the exploration. In Test Pit 2 we observed <br /> dense sand that contained lenses of silt underneath the outwash between a depth of 6 and 10 feet. <br /> From 5 to 10 feet below the ground surface in Test Pit 3 we observed slightly silty to sifty sand that <br /> contained chunks of silt and glacial till. No groundwater seepage or wet soil conditions were <br /> observed in any of the test pits. The explorations were conducted following a hot, dry spring and <br /> summer, when groundwater levels would be near their lowest. Based on our observations and the <br /> lack of substantial groundwater recharge area upslope of the site, it appears that the seasonal high <br /> groundwater level is below the dense outwash soil. <br /> CONCLUSIONS <br /> Based on the test pits conducted on the site, the soil below a depth of 2 to 3 feet is moderately <br /> permeable. The outwash sand and gravel has a negligible silt content, but is very compact, as it <br /> has been glacially compressed. The undertying sand and slightly silty sand is dense and is <br /> intermixed with chunks of silt and glacial till. The density of the outwash, and the presence of silty <br /> inclusions in the underlying sand reduces the permeability of these soils. <br /> No impervious layer, such as intact glacial till, or signs of shallow groundwater were observed in the <br /> test pits. <br /> We recommend that the infiltration trenches all extend through the upper silty soils to reach the <br /> underlying outwash sand and gravel. The outwash, which is the most permeable soil encountered <br /> in the test pits, is deepest in the southern portion of the site. Better long-term perFormance of the <br /> infiltration system would be achieved by placing more of the trenches on the southern portion of the <br /> property, if that is possible The trenches should extend no more than approximately 6 inches into <br /> this soil, to keep the trenches above the underlying siltier soil found in the northern test pits. <br /> Considering the low silt content of the outwash, but its compact condition, we recommend a long- <br /> term design infiltration rate of no more than 0.25 inches per hour be assumed. This value should <br /> be conservative even for the northern portion of the site where there is less of the outwash soil. <br /> The performance of any infiltration system will degrade over time as the surrounding soils become <br /> clogged with silt and debris. Gutters, pavements and catch basins should be cleaned regularly to <br /> extend the effective life of the infiltration systems. As with any buried drainage system, it is <br /> possible that infiltration systems will have to be replaced in the future if their performance becomes <br /> inadequate. <br /> LIMITATIONS <br /> The conclusions and recommendations contained in this report are based on site conditions as <br /> they existed at the time of our exploration and assume that the soil and groundwater conditions <br /> encountered in the test pits are representative of subsurface conditions on the site. If the <br /> GEOTECH CONSULTANTS, INC. ,,I� .�+ 1 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.