Laserfiche WebLink
a. Increased Mitigation Ratios. The city may increase the ratios under any one of the <br />following circumstances: <br />i. Uncertainty as to the probable success of the proposed restoration or creation; <br />ii. Significant period of time between destruction and replication of wetland <br />functions; <br />iii. The proposed mitigation will result in a lower category wetland or projected <br />losses in functions relative to the wetland being impacted; <br />iv. The relocation is off-site or the replacement is with out -of -kind compensation; <br />v. The wetland has been illegally filled or altered. <br />b. Decreased Mitigation Ratios. The city may decrease these ratios under the following <br />circumstances: <br />i. Documentation by a qualified wetland specialist demonstrates that the proposed <br />mitigation actions have a very high likelihood of success. <br />ii. Documentation by a qualified wetland specialist demonstrates that the proposed <br />mitigation actions will provide significantly greater functions than the wetland <br />being impacted. <br />iii. The mitigation actions are conducted in advance of the impact and have been <br />shown to be successful. <br />c. In lieu of the ratios described above, mitigation ratios may be calculated using the <br />method in Calculating Credits and Debits for Compensatory Mitigation in Wetlands <br />of Western Washington: Final Report, March 2012. Washington State Department of <br />Ecology Publication #10-06-011. <br />d. In no case shall the mitigation acreage be less than that which is altered. <br />6. When wetland compensation is allowed, the city may require that the wetland <br />compensation be completed and functioning prior to allowing the existing wetland to be <br />filled or altered. For category I wetlands, the city shall require the relocated wetland area <br />to be completed and functioning prior to allowing the existing wetland to be altered. <br />7. The city may limit certain development activities near a wetland to specific months in <br />order to minimize impacts on wetland functions. <br />8. The city may apply additional conditions or restrictions or require specific construction <br />techniques in order to minimize impacts on wetland functions. <br />9. Wetland compensation shall not occur in areas having high-quality terrestrial habitat. <br />10. When wetland compensation is allowed, mitigation areas shall be located to preserve or <br />achieve contiguous wildlife habitat corridors to minimize the isolation and fragmenting <br />effects of development on habitat areas. <br />11. When wetland creation is proposed, all required buffers for the creation site shall be <br />located on the proposed creation site. Properties adjacent to or abutting wetland creation <br />projects shall not be responsible for providing any additional buffer requirements. <br />12. Wetland mitigation banks are sites where wetlands are restored, created, enhanced, or in <br />exceptional circumstances, preserved, expressly for the purpose of providing <br />compensatory mitigation in advance of authorized impacts to similar resources. Banks <br />typically involve the consolidation of many small wetland mitigation projects into a <br />larger, potentially more ecologically valuable site. Such consolidation encourages greater <br />diversity of habitat and wetland functions. It also helps create more sustainable systems. <br />Banks provide a greater likelihood of success over permittee -responsible mitigation <br />projects, since the banks are up and running before unavoidable damage occurs to a <br />wetland(s) at another site. <br />18 <br />